1
|
Oct 19/22 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
|
2
|
----------------------------------------------
|
3
|
(Notes by GH and SJDK)
|
4
|
|
5
|
Today: PionLT will be discussed first
|
6
|
|
7
|
Please remember to post your slides at:
|
8
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
|
9
|
|
10
|
Present:
|
11
|
Regina - Garth Huber, Stephen Kay, Ali Usman, Love Preet, Alicia Postuma,
|
12
|
Vijay Kumar, Nathan Heinrich, Muhammad Junaid
|
13
|
CSULA - Konrad Aniol, Emery Gunselman, Johnathan Conrad, Yeranuhui Ghandilyan
|
14
|
Ohio - Julie Roche
|
15
|
CUA - Richard Trotta, Tanja Horn
|
16
|
JLab - Dave Gaskell
|
17
|
|
18
|
Richard Updates
|
19
|
---------------
|
20
|
- Bill LT separation code updates
|
21
|
- Stephen and Richard took a closer look at the code, ran into issues,
|
22
|
determined it was a compilation issue
|
23
|
- Contacted Bill, Bill resolved it very quickly for us over the weekend
|
24
|
- Thanks Bill!
|
25
|
- Requires a slightly updated cmake version, but this is a trivial change
|
26
|
- Need to work on some updates to the code, change how cuts are applied etc
|
27
|
- We already do this in our KaonLT code
|
28
|
- all hardcoded file calls are fixed
|
29
|
|
30
|
- Tracking issues with Lumi
|
31
|
- SHMS tracked yield still looks odd (-25%)
|
32
|
- SHMS scaler analysis has +16% trend
|
33
|
- DG: are you using pruning in the tracked analysis?
|
34
|
- does not affect efficiency, just how to select best track
|
35
|
- it could be there's a higher probability of selecting unphysical track
|
36
|
at higher rate (more discussion later on pruning algorithm checks)
|
37
|
|
38
|
- For the HMS lumi studies - DG comment from Ali's committee meeting
|
39
|
- Use ELREAL rather than ELCLEAN scalers
|
40
|
- ELCLEAN is much cleaner, might not so affected at high rate
|
41
|
- May help yields
|
42
|
- Offset in BCM calibration
|
43
|
- For low current, could just be a BCM calibration offset (100-200nA) that's
|
44
|
causing the difference
|
45
|
- then apply same offset to all data NEAR THAT TIME
|
46
|
- definitely the 8.2GeV HMS scan shows evidence of the offset issue, as
|
47
|
other points are flat ws current, and the first low current point is
|
48
|
high
|
49
|
- TH: Fpi-2 scaler lumi analysis also had some issues
|
50
|
- for +polarity SHMS scan, probably will have to accept what we get once
|
51
|
we get the - polarity scans to work out
|
52
|
|
53
|
- Talk for Hall C analysis meeting
|
54
|
- Defining luminosities
|
55
|
- Outlining cuts
|
56
|
- Will clarify some slides and add a few updates
|
57
|
- Will circulate tomorrow before the meeting
|
58
|
- Richard will be sending an email to Ali & Vijay requesting content for his DNP talk
|
59
|
|
60
|
Ali Updates
|
61
|
-----------
|
62
|
- To Do List:
|
63
|
- test Peter Bosted's offsets and see how well they work
|
64
|
- Investigate tracking a bit more, i.e. refresh tracking params
|
65
|
- SHMS tracking efficiencies in particular still the big issue
|
66
|
- believes we use pruning globally, will do some double checking
|
67
|
- three different ways to select best track
|
68
|
- DG: can apply cuts on many parameters, including xptar, PDF, delta, etc.
|
69
|
- has concern that this can bias the track selection
|
70
|
- should select a conservative set of pruning criteria that give a fixed
|
71
|
rate dependence and use that, but optimal values might change with setting
|
72
|
- Peter Bosted tends to be very aggressive with pruning cuts, and not sure
|
73
|
if this is the right strategy
|
74
|
- GH: suggest to look at lumi runs 5154-5299 (7 runs) and see what the rate
|
75
|
dependence looks like under different pruning scenarios
|
76
|
|
77
|
Vijay Updates
|
78
|
-------------
|
79
|
- Busy making slides for committee meeting
|
80
|
- Meeting is on Friday morning (10:00 CST)
|
81
|
- To Do List:
|
82
|
- 2.7 GeV pionLT data - need to do the Lumi analysis
|
83
|
- Carbon first
|
84
|
- Then LH2
|
85
|
- Pion/Kaon PID studies: cut finalization, cut dependency
|
86
|
- LT Separation
|
87
|
- On the cards for next year
|
88
|
- Some issues with Lumi scripts, need to diagnose
|
89
|
- Contact Stephen if encountering errors
|
90
|
|
91
|
Jacob Updates
|
92
|
-------------
|
93
|
- Not at meeting, but will co-ordinate with Richard re:Analysis Meeting tomorrow
|
94
|
|
95
|
Nathan Updates
|
96
|
--------------
|
97
|
- PhD comprehensive done
|
98
|
- PhD Committee meeting coming soon too, report in progress
|
99
|
- Need to check with Jacob on his progress for calibrations
|
100
|
- To Do List:
|
101
|
- NGC code updates
|
102
|
- Someone mentioned previously (last week?) that there's a new NGC
|
103
|
calibration code
|
104
|
- Cameron Cotton updated it, can't identify single PE peak in NGC so
|
105
|
approach is different
|
106
|
- fits a Gaussian to the NPE distribution and infer calibration from the
|
107
|
width
|
108
|
- GH: a Poisson fit would work better, as the distribution is asymmetric
|
109
|
at low NPE
|
110
|
|
111
|
Junaid Updates
|
112
|
--------------
|
113
|
- PhD comprehensive written part is done
|
114
|
- Oral exam this afternoon, good luck!
|
115
|
- PhD Committee meeting coming soon too, report in progress
|
116
|
- To Do List:
|
117
|
- Calorimeter and DC calibrations
|
118
|
|
119
|
Alicia Updates
|
120
|
--------------
|
121
|
- Made a start on the helicity analysis
|
122
|
- very preliminary plots without optimized cuts
|
123
|
- Already looks relatively promising, see spin asymmetries
|
124
|
- To Do List:
|
125
|
- KaonLT data PID
|
126
|
- Background subtraction
|
127
|
- MM peak fitting/integration
|
128
|
|
129
|
Next Week
|
130
|
---------
|
131
|
- PionLT will be first
|
132
|
- GH will join from Vancouver before his flight to New Orleans
|
133
|
- Stephen will be in-flight to DNP meeting
|
134
|
|
135
|
Reminder about meeting time for Nov 9-Dec 21
|
136
|
--------------------------------------------
|
137
|
- Wednesdays at 7:15 Regina/8:15 Eastern
|
138
|
- really apologize to those joining from California, but no other time worked
|
139
|
for everyone
|
140
|
- will have a different poll for Jan-March, when people's teaching schedules
|
141
|
are different. Hopefully we can find a later time in the day
|