1
|
July 6/23 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
|
2
|
----------------------------------------------
|
3
|
(Notes by GH)
|
4
|
|
5
|
Today: KaonLT will be discussed first
|
6
|
|
7
|
Please remember to post your slides at:
|
8
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
|
9
|
|
10
|
Present
|
11
|
-------
|
12
|
Regina - Garth Huber, Ali Usman, Muhammad Junaid, Nathan Heinrich, Vijay Kumar,
|
13
|
Alicia Postuma
|
14
|
CUA - Richard Trotta, Tanja Horn
|
15
|
JLab - Dave Gaskell
|
16
|
FIU - Pete Markowitz
|
17
|
Ohio - Julie Roche
|
18
|
CSULA - Konrad Aniol
|
19
|
|
20
|
Richard Updates
|
21
|
---------------
|
22
|
Meeting with Peter Bosted is tomorrow at 13:00 Eastern
|
23
|
Zoom Mtg ID: 815 5260 0153
|
24
|
Passcode: 746974
|
25
|
|
26
|
HGC cuts and efficiency calculations
|
27
|
- applied one of Vijay's cuts, but it looks too small in comparison to hole in
|
28
|
NPE vs (x,y), the data are 10.6GeV, maybe the cut is for 8 GeV?
|
29
|
- Vijay drew several versions of the cuts, needs to look them up
|
30
|
- Vijay thinks he drew the cut on Efficiency vs (x,y), not NPE
|
31
|
- will look up older reports, and meet with Richard on this after meeting
|
32
|
with PeterB
|
33
|
|
34
|
BCM calibrations
|
35
|
- DG: PeterB doesn't use the most updated analyzer, it does not have Dave
|
36
|
Mack's high current non-linearity correction in it
|
37
|
- if you apply PeterB's BCM correction, you are double-applying the
|
38
|
non-linearity correction
|
39
|
|
40
|
Ali Updates
|
41
|
-----------
|
42
|
- updated standard.database to read in proper BPM files for each run period
|
43
|
|
44
|
- setting up scripts for LT-analysis
|
45
|
- want to finalize t-binning as Alicia needs this too
|
46
|
- needs diamond cuts to be applied first
|
47
|
|
48
|
- want to compare cuts w/ Alicia, should overall be similar, except for HGC
|
49
|
cut
|
50
|
- AP reminds us that she will do a HGC cut dependence study, but no HGC cut
|
51
|
will be used in the final results, as the asymmetries are very similar
|
52
|
but with larger errors
|
53
|
|
54
|
- running SIMC for pi+n, pi+SIDIS, pi+Delta0
|
55
|
|
56
|
- working on offsets
|
57
|
- reran Heep singles w/ updated BPM, to give more data points at mid-HMS
|
58
|
momentum
|
59
|
|
60
|
Vijay Updates
|
61
|
-------------
|
62
|
Working on HMS calorimeter efficiency study
|
63
|
- DG had suggested plots vs p_HMS for fixed cut
|
64
|
Left: >0.2 cut Right: >0.7 cut
|
65
|
Three data sets: p_HMS=0.448, 1.35 2.25 GeV/c
|
66
|
- efficiency is high and stable for >0.2 cut
|
67
|
- efficiency for >0.7 cut is very low at 0.448 GeV/c
|
68
|
|
69
|
- DG: apparently Dave Mack found that FADC threshold was set too high, caused
|
70
|
inefficient calorimeter regions for P<1 GeV/c
|
71
|
- had forgotten about this, now agrees that it's okay to use a lower cut
|
72
|
for low HMS momentum
|
73
|
- does Vijay have a calorimeter plots that we can look at
|
74
|
Yes, but needs a few minutes to find them
|
75
|
|
76
|
Alicia Updates
|
77
|
--------------
|
78
|
Waiting on t-binning from Ali
|
79
|
|
80
|
Working on PARTONS GPD library
|
81
|
- sigl, sigt, siglt, etc are private functions only
|
82
|
- modifying code to implement new classes to allow these cross sections to be
|
83
|
outputted
|
84
|
- since DEMP reactions are only recently implemented, unlike DVCS, only
|
85
|
asymmetries are output so far, and thinks it's likely the authors haven't
|
86
|
gotten around to doing this yet
|
87
|
- JR: suggest reaching out to the authors to see if they have any suggestions
|
88
|
or warnings on doing this
|
89
|
|
90
|
- will have a tutorial next week on running PARTONS
|
91
|
- Julie is interested, we will circulate a Zoom link when it's scheduled
|
92
|
|
93
|
Vijay (2)
|
94
|
---------
|
95
|
Shows plot of H_cal_Etottracknorm
|
96
|
- looks very clean, no pion background even below <0.2 at 0.448, 1.35 GeV/c
|
97
|
- applied cuts: HMS Cherenkov, CoinTime prompt peak
|
98
|
- DG: at these momenta, the TOF differences between pions and electrons are
|
99
|
large, we need to see what the plot looks like when accidentals are
|
100
|
included, as accidental coincidences cut could cause issues
|
101
|
- Vijay will quickly replay one run so we can see the plot
|
102
|
|
103
|
Nathan Updates
|
104
|
--------------
|
105
|
More work on SHMS HGC calibrations
|
106
|
- more data points so we can see the trends in the data
|
107
|
- the decreasing trend up to run ~13900 looks to be real
|
108
|
- this apparently corresponds to when 7.9GeV beam began
|
109
|
- after this, the calibrations are stable all the way to the end of the 2022
|
110
|
run
|
111
|
- suggests to take a constant calibration for all runs after start of 7.9GeV
|
112
|
beam to end of 2022
|
113
|
- for sloping part, fit calib data with a line and calculate middle value for
|
114
|
a setting
|
115
|
- TH: suggest two plateaus (beginning and end) and a linear part in between
|
116
|
PMTs 3,4 show the early plateau more clearly compared to PMTS 1,2
|
117
|
|
118
|
- GH asks about some gaps in the plots
|
119
|
- plot shows calib setting by setting only, with point at the earliest run
|
120
|
number
|
121
|
- GH suggests that for settings taking longer than a day that the period be
|
122
|
sub-divided, and calculate from the linear trend for each period, maybe even
|
123
|
for each individual run number if that is easier to set up
|
124
|
|
125
|
- Some discussion on what is causing the decreasing trend in the calibration
|
126
|
- we know the HV monitor was stable, so the PMT gain should have been stable
|
127
|
- JR: is the HGC signal going through a pre-amplifier?
|
128
|
- DG: for sure the NGC was, need to check about the HGC
|
129
|
- GH: please try to look at the hclog during the period while 9.2GeV beam was
|
130
|
being tuned (only a few shifts) and see if there is a log entry on if
|
131
|
anything was adjusted
|
132
|
|
133
|
Junaid Updates
|
134
|
--------------
|
135
|
Updated DC calibs for both spectrometers
|
136
|
- will post slides and sample plots (shown last week) on RedMine
|
137
|
|
138
|
Working on HMS calorimeter
|
139
|
- fixing path issues
|
140
|
- hoping to see some plots next week
|
141
|
|
142
|
Jacob
|
143
|
-----
|
144
|
- Julie informs us that Jacob is taking a medical leave of absence until
|
145
|
December
|
146
|
- we hope he is doing okay
|
147
|
|
148
|
Vijay (3)
|
149
|
---------
|
150
|
Replay of one 2.2 GeV/c run is completed
|
151
|
- plot w/o CoinTime cut shows small grass <0.2, with a minimum at 0.3 (on log
|
152
|
scale)
|
153
|
- DG: agrees that a cut at either 0.2 or 0.3 is reasonable
|
154
|
- thanks Vijay for showing all of these plots on a short time scale
|
155
|
|
156
|
Next Meeting
|
157
|
------------
|
158
|
- Thur July 13 @ 16:00 Eastern/14:00 Regina/13:00 Pacific
|
159
|
- PionLT will go first
|
160
|
|
161
|
|
162
|
|
163
|
|
164
|
|
165
|
|
166
|
|
167
|
|