| 
      1
     | 
    
                       Jan 4/24 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      2
     | 
    
                       ---------------------------------------------
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      3
     | 
    
                                    (Notes by GH)
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      4
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      5
     | 
    
                           Today: PionLT will be discussed first
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      6
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      7
     | 
    
      Please remember to post your slides at:
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      8
     | 
    
      https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      9
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      10
     | 
    
      Present
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      11
     | 
    
      -------
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      12
     | 
    
      Regina - Garth Huber, Nathan Heinrich, Ali Usman, Alicia Postuma, 
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      13
     | 
    
         Muhammad Junaid, Nacer Hamdi, Vijay Kumar
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      14
     | 
    
      CUA - Richard Trotta, Casey Morean, Tanja Horn
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      15
     | 
    
      JLab - Dave Gaskell
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      16
     | 
    
      FIU - Pete Markowitz
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      17
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      18
     | 
    
      Nathan
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      19
     | 
    
      ------
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      20
     | 
    
      - working on slides for Hall C meeting, need to have draft slides ready for
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      21
     | 
    
        Thurs Jan 11
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      22
     | 
    
      - will start working on Lumi Carbon singles data from Sept/22
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      23
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      24
     | 
    
      Junaid
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      25
     | 
    
      ------
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      26
     | 
    
      Completed replay of PionLT data
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      27
     | 
    
      - 7 scripts for Heep (coin, HMS-sing, SHMS-sing), Lumi, Physics
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      28
     | 
    
      - batch scripts take 3 arguments
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      29
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      30
     | 
    
      - various issues encountered during the replays that took a lot of attention
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      31
     | 
    
        - broken symlinks, typos, duplicate run#
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      32
     | 
    
        - fixed all issues, all data now on cache disk
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      33
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      34
     | 
    
      Tracking Efficiency study
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      35
     | 
    
      - SHMS cuts to be used
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      36
     | 
    
        - it's important that variables involving tracked info (e.g. P.aero.xAtAero)
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      37
     | 
    
          are not used in any way in the study
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      38
     | 
    
        - add a cut CAL>0.05 (no_track variable) on SHMS
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      39
     | 
    
      - HMS cuts
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      40
     | 
    
        - add H.cal.etotnorm > 0.7
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      41
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      42
     | 
    
      Richard
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      43
     | 
    
      -------
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      44
     | 
    
      HGC cut status in physics analysis
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      45
     | 
    
      - mis-spoke at last meeting that no HGC cut is applied
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      46
     | 
    
       - in reality, HGC<1.5pe cut outside inefficient region is used
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      47
     | 
    
       - also a hole cut is applied, needs to be added also to SIMC analysi
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      48
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      49
     | 
    
      - MM_K plot
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      50
     | 
    
        - Black=Center  Red=Left  Green=Right
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      51
     | 
    
        - Lambda peak looks fairly clean, reasonable normalized yield consistency
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      52
     | 
    
          between the three settings
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      53
     | 
    
        - *NEED TO DO* a Lambda yield vs HGC cut study
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      54
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      55
     | 
    
      Heep data/MC yields under various conditions
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      56
     | 
    
      - as presented at the last meeting, there is a significant linear trend to the
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      57
     | 
    
        Data/MC ratio vs Q2
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      58
     | 
    
      - various investigations to see where this is coming from
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      59
     | 
    
      - applying a SHMS Dipole Exit Cut
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      60
     | 
    
        - DG: need to apply the same cut to SIMC data
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      61
     | 
    
      - PID cuts
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      62
     | 
    
        - DG: suggests to remove all SHMS proton cuts
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      63
     | 
    
      - Heep data up to Q2=7.5
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      64
     | 
    
        - this is a significantly higher Q2 than we have done in past Heep-check
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      65
     | 
    
        - can try a different Heep parameterization in SIMC, follow instructions in
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      66
     | 
    
          Wenliang Li's PhD thesis
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      67
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      68
     | 
    
      Sorting out issues with Bill's LT-separation code
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      69
     | 
    
      - come questions about seemingly arbitrary parameterization need clarification
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      70
     | 
    
        - we will have a separate meeting on Friday at 14:30 Eastern about this
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      71
     | 
    
          Meeting ID: 954 3340 5506
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      72
     | 
    
         Passcode: 901353
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      73
     | 
    
      - testing the code with Q2=2.1 data
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      74
     | 
    
      - various issues with batch submission scripts failing, even though jobs run
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      75
     | 
    
        fine from terminal
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      76
     | 
    
        - Casey suggests to use -phase and -antecedent parameters in SWIF job
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      77
     | 
    
          submissions
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      78
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      79
     | 
    
      Ali
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      80
     | 
    
      ---
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      81
     | 
    
      pi+Delta0 BSA analysis
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      82
     | 
    
      - earlier, DG suggested to investigate rho+N->pi+pi0N contribution in addition
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      83
     | 
    
        to SIDIS
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      84
     | 
    
        - SIMC simulation very inefficient
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      85
     | 
    
        - took ~3 days to get 200k events
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      86
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      87
     | 
    
      - comparision of rho and SIDIS MC (weighted distributions)
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      88
     | 
    
        - rho peaks at lower MM~1.15 than SIDIS (MM~1.4)
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      89
     | 
    
        - looks like rho will be useful in obtaining a better fit of MM region to
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      90
     | 
    
          left of Delta
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      91
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      92
     | 
    
      - t-distribution >0 for rho 
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      93
     | 
    
        - DG: confirms that for his rho files, t<0, so there must be a sign issue
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      94
     | 
    
        - some discussion that it migt be a reconstruction code issue, Ali will
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      95
     | 
    
          investigate
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      96
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      97
     | 
    
      - tentative strength of rho
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      98
     | 
    
        - DG: initial guess from prior SIDIS analysis is that rho is 10-20% of SIDIS
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      99
     | 
    
        - this seems a good guide for Ali's initial fitting
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      100
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      101
     | 
    
      - discussion about large pi+n tail and how to deal with it
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      102
     | 
    
        - NH suggests to arbitrarily scale up the pi+n MC to fit the tail, even
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      103
     | 
    
          though it would dramatically over-shoot the neutron peak
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      104
     | 
    
        - GH: before contemplating this, we really should deal with the issue that
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      105
     | 
    
          the data MM resolution is worse than predicted by MC
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      106
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      107
     | 
    
      - DG: made some plots earlier of MM versus FP variables, found some
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      108
     | 
    
        correlations
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      109
     | 
    
        - will try to look at this in a bit more detail
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      110
     | 
    
        - AP will direct DG to where the newest ROOT trees are located
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      111
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      112
     | 
    
      Vijay
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      113
     | 
    
      -----
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      114
     | 
    
      - no plots, but working on LT-sep analysis, will attend tomorrow's meeting
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      115
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      116
     | 
    
      Alicia
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      117
     | 
    
      ------
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      118
     | 
    
      - working on slides for Hall C meeting, need to have draft slides ready for
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      119
     | 
    
        Thurs Jan 11
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      120
     | 
    
      - sorting out some out of memory errors in python analysis scripts
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      121
     | 
    
      - looking at PARTONS GPD code, manually change contributions of GPDs as per
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      122
     | 
    
        Stefan Diehl's paper
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      123
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      124
     | 
    
      Nacer
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      125
     | 
    
      -----
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      126
     | 
    
      KaonLT Q2=0.5 drift chamber calibration checks
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      127
     | 
    
      - Junaid helped adapt code from PionLT to KaonLT
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      128
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      129
     | 
    
      - initial plots of SHMS drift distance spectra
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      130
     | 
    
        BLUE=after calib  RED=before calib
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      131
     | 
    
      - red has some significant deficits for d<0.1, particularly SHMS 1v,1u planes
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      132
     | 
    
      - blue looks better in some spots, but SHMS 2v planes indicate new t0 offsets
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      133
     | 
    
        are needed, deficit for d<0.1, and residual distributions actually worse than
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      134
     | 
    
        red
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      135
     | 
    
        - need to rerun code with t0 flag off, Junaid will give info
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      136
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      137
     | 
    
      Next Meeting
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      138
     | 
    
      ------------
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      139
     | 
    
      - Thur Jan 11 @ 15:00 Eastern/14:00 Regina
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      140
     | 
    
        - KaonLT will go first
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      141
     | 
    
      
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      142
     | 
    
      Please fill out the poll at:
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      143
     | 
    
        https://www.when2meet.com/?22907632-UJ4DV
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      144
     | 
    
      So far, it looks like Thursdays at 14:30 Eastern/13:30 Regina is best
 
     | 
  
  
    | 
      145
     | 
    
      
 
     |