1
|
Jan 4/24 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
|
2
|
---------------------------------------------
|
3
|
(Notes by GH)
|
4
|
|
5
|
Today: PionLT will be discussed first
|
6
|
|
7
|
Please remember to post your slides at:
|
8
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
|
9
|
|
10
|
Present
|
11
|
-------
|
12
|
Regina - Garth Huber, Nathan Heinrich, Ali Usman, Alicia Postuma,
|
13
|
Muhammad Junaid, Nacer Hamdi, Vijay Kumar
|
14
|
CUA - Richard Trotta, Casey Morean, Tanja Horn
|
15
|
JLab - Dave Gaskell
|
16
|
FIU - Pete Markowitz
|
17
|
|
18
|
Nathan
|
19
|
------
|
20
|
- working on slides for Hall C meeting, need to have draft slides ready for
|
21
|
Thurs Jan 11
|
22
|
- will start working on Lumi Carbon singles data from Sept/22
|
23
|
|
24
|
Junaid
|
25
|
------
|
26
|
Completed replay of PionLT data
|
27
|
- 7 scripts for Heep (coin, HMS-sing, SHMS-sing), Lumi, Physics
|
28
|
- batch scripts take 3 arguments
|
29
|
|
30
|
- various issues encountered during the replays that took a lot of attention
|
31
|
- broken symlinks, typos, duplicate run#
|
32
|
- fixed all issues, all data now on cache disk
|
33
|
|
34
|
Tracking Efficiency study
|
35
|
- SHMS cuts to be used
|
36
|
- it's important that variables involving tracked info (e.g. P.aero.xAtAero)
|
37
|
are not used in any way in the study
|
38
|
- add a cut CAL>0.05 (no_track variable) on SHMS
|
39
|
- HMS cuts
|
40
|
- add H.cal.etotnorm > 0.7
|
41
|
|
42
|
Richard
|
43
|
-------
|
44
|
HGC cut status in physics analysis
|
45
|
- mis-spoke at last meeting that no HGC cut is applied
|
46
|
- in reality, HGC<1.5pe cut outside inefficient region is used
|
47
|
- also a hole cut is applied, needs to be added also to SIMC analysi
|
48
|
|
49
|
- MM_K plot
|
50
|
- Black=Center Red=Left Green=Right
|
51
|
- Lambda peak looks fairly clean, reasonable normalized yield consistency
|
52
|
between the three settings
|
53
|
- *NEED TO DO* a Lambda yield vs HGC cut study
|
54
|
|
55
|
Heep data/MC yields under various conditions
|
56
|
- as presented at the last meeting, there is a significant linear trend to the
|
57
|
Data/MC ratio vs Q2
|
58
|
- various investigations to see where this is coming from
|
59
|
- applying a SHMS Dipole Exit Cut
|
60
|
- DG: need to apply the same cut to SIMC data
|
61
|
- PID cuts
|
62
|
- DG: suggests to remove all SHMS proton cuts
|
63
|
- Heep data up to Q2=7.5
|
64
|
- this is a significantly higher Q2 than we have done in past Heep-check
|
65
|
- can try a different Heep parameterization in SIMC, follow instructions in
|
66
|
Wenliang Li's PhD thesis
|
67
|
|
68
|
Sorting out issues with Bill's LT-separation code
|
69
|
- come questions about seemingly arbitrary parameterization need clarification
|
70
|
- we will have a separate meeting on Friday at 14:30 Eastern about this
|
71
|
Meeting ID: 954 3340 5506
|
72
|
Passcode: 901353
|
73
|
- testing the code with Q2=2.1 data
|
74
|
- various issues with batch submission scripts failing, even though jobs run
|
75
|
fine from terminal
|
76
|
- Casey suggests to use -phase and -antecedent parameters in SWIF job
|
77
|
submissions
|
78
|
|
79
|
Ali
|
80
|
---
|
81
|
pi+Delta0 BSA analysis
|
82
|
- earlier, DG suggested to investigate rho+N->pi+pi0N contribution in addition
|
83
|
to SIDIS
|
84
|
- SIMC simulation very inefficient
|
85
|
- took ~3 days to get 200k events
|
86
|
|
87
|
- comparision of rho and SIDIS MC (weighted distributions)
|
88
|
- rho peaks at lower MM~1.15 than SIDIS (MM~1.4)
|
89
|
- looks like rho will be useful in obtaining a better fit of MM region to
|
90
|
left of Delta
|
91
|
|
92
|
- t-distribution >0 for rho
|
93
|
- DG: confirms that for his rho files, t<0, so there must be a sign issue
|
94
|
- some discussion that it migt be a reconstruction code issue, Ali will
|
95
|
investigate
|
96
|
|
97
|
- tentative strength of rho
|
98
|
- DG: initial guess from prior SIDIS analysis is that rho is 10-20% of SIDIS
|
99
|
- this seems a good guide for Ali's initial fitting
|
100
|
|
101
|
- discussion about large pi+n tail and how to deal with it
|
102
|
- NH suggests to arbitrarily scale up the pi+n MC to fit the tail, even
|
103
|
though it would dramatically over-shoot the neutron peak
|
104
|
- GH: before contemplating this, we really should deal with the issue that
|
105
|
the data MM resolution is worse than predicted by MC
|
106
|
|
107
|
- DG: made some plots earlier of MM versus FP variables, found some
|
108
|
correlations
|
109
|
- will try to look at this in a bit more detail
|
110
|
- AP will direct DG to where the newest ROOT trees are located
|
111
|
|
112
|
Vijay
|
113
|
-----
|
114
|
- no plots, but working on LT-sep analysis, will attend tomorrow's meeting
|
115
|
|
116
|
Alicia
|
117
|
------
|
118
|
- working on slides for Hall C meeting, need to have draft slides ready for
|
119
|
Thurs Jan 11
|
120
|
- sorting out some out of memory errors in python analysis scripts
|
121
|
- looking at PARTONS GPD code, manually change contributions of GPDs as per
|
122
|
Stefan Diehl's paper
|
123
|
|
124
|
Nacer
|
125
|
-----
|
126
|
KaonLT Q2=0.5 drift chamber calibration checks
|
127
|
- Junaid helped adapt code from PionLT to KaonLT
|
128
|
|
129
|
- initial plots of SHMS drift distance spectra
|
130
|
BLUE=after calib RED=before calib
|
131
|
- red has some significant deficits for d<0.1, particularly SHMS 1v,1u planes
|
132
|
- blue looks better in some spots, but SHMS 2v planes indicate new t0 offsets
|
133
|
are needed, deficit for d<0.1, and residual distributions actually worse than
|
134
|
red
|
135
|
- need to rerun code with t0 flag off, Junaid will give info
|
136
|
|
137
|
Next Meeting
|
138
|
------------
|
139
|
- Thur Jan 11 @ 15:00 Eastern/14:00 Regina
|
140
|
- KaonLT will go first
|
141
|
|
142
|
Please fill out the poll at:
|
143
|
https://www.when2meet.com/?22907632-UJ4DV
|
144
|
So far, it looks like Thursdays at 14:30 Eastern/13:30 Regina is best
|
145
|
|