1
|
Jan 25/24 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
|
2
|
----------------------------------------------
|
3
|
(Notes by GH & Richard Trotta)
|
4
|
|
5
|
Today: PionLT will be discussed first
|
6
|
|
7
|
Please remember to post your slides at:
|
8
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
|
9
|
|
10
|
Present
|
11
|
-------
|
12
|
Regina - Ali Usman, Muhammad Junaid, Vijay Kumar, Nacer Hamdi, Garth Huber
|
13
|
JLab - Dave Gaskell
|
14
|
CSULA - Konrad Aniol
|
15
|
FIU - Pete Markowitz
|
16
|
CUA - Tanja Horn, Richard Trotta
|
17
|
|
18
|
Junaid
|
19
|
------
|
20
|
Efficiency studies
|
21
|
- CSV files of eff values created for all data
|
22
|
- working on scripts for lumi, heep, and finalizing plotting scripts
|
23
|
- Plotting scripts for efficiencies read in csv of efficiencies and plot from
|
24
|
there
|
25
|
- updating REPORT FILES but Heep efficiencies are calculating incorrectly. The
|
26
|
issue is the error bar of efficiencies, not the efficiencies themselves.
|
27
|
- Ali: there might be a bug in the TEMPLATE file, such as the error formula
|
28
|
somehow dividing by zero. If efficiencies themselves are okay, then DEF
|
29
|
files ok.
|
30
|
|
31
|
Richard
|
32
|
-------
|
33
|
Issues replaying Dummy runs
|
34
|
- dtype error
|
35
|
- python cut script gave error for some runs and not processed
|
36
|
- fixed code to catch error when there is an empty ROOT tree. Code now says
|
37
|
which trees are empty
|
38
|
- CT cut issue
|
39
|
- met w/Stephen on Jan 24
|
40
|
- CT offset was not applied to Dummy runs. SK missed a few Dummy runs in
|
41
|
standard.kinematics
|
42
|
- Vijay found a similar issue for some runs
|
43
|
|
44
|
Weird features in some t-distributions
|
45
|
- some (e,e'K+) runs had a spiky t-distrubtion
|
46
|
- getting events lower than the -t_min for K+ in that setting, which is a
|
47
|
sudden jump in distribution from the allowed region
|
48
|
- most likely due to insufficient PID cut, both pi+ and proton leakthrough,
|
49
|
some evidence of both pi+n and p+omega peaks
|
50
|
- after tightening HGC cut, the t-distribution looks better
|
51
|
- seems to have evidence of Lambda(1405) and other resonances in Q2=2.115
|
52
|
center, low epsilon data
|
53
|
- this is pleasant news, in the online analysis only the high epsilon data
|
54
|
(w/o diamond cut) showed strong evidence of the higher hyperon states
|
55
|
|
56
|
- GH: suggests to generate *clean* pi+ and proton spectra, normalize them to the
|
57
|
pi+n and p+omega peaks and *subtract* them to get an even cleaner K+
|
58
|
distribution
|
59
|
- absolutely must be finalized before starting iterations!
|
60
|
- also critical to determine the correct PID efficiencies to apply to data
|
61
|
|
62
|
Fixed binning issue
|
63
|
- long-standing binning issue, some bins were always empty when binning over
|
64
|
Q2-bar, W-bar, t, epsilon
|
65
|
- rewrote both binning scripts for average kinematics and yields
|
66
|
- now looks much better
|
67
|
|
68
|
Separated cross-section script
|
69
|
- scripts now working!
|
70
|
- now can debug things properly with average kinematics and yields
|
71
|
- some issues were encountered in not treating t-bins in a consistent
|
72
|
sequence
|
73
|
- now can generate Iteration-0 plots, then can try to do the next iteration
|
74
|
- process in general works, but need to resolve PID issues first
|
75
|
|
76
|
- DG: your high epsilon data show a weird left-right phi asymmetry that is
|
77
|
unphysical
|
78
|
- need to look more closely at what is causing this
|
79
|
|
80
|
SIMC MM weirdness
|
81
|
- plot shown for Q2=3.0, W=3.14, low-eps, center
|
82
|
- K+L MM distribution has a bizarrely long tail that is much bigger than the
|
83
|
data, exactly the opposite situation than was encountered by Alicia, where
|
84
|
the pi+n MM tail is under-predicted by SIMC
|
85
|
- GH: maybe it's a radiative tail flag that is wrong??
|
86
|
|
87
|
SIMC negative counts for some kinematics at highest Q2
|
88
|
- for Q2=5.5, the Iteration-0 script gives negative weight events
|
89
|
- corresponds to sigT<0 for some kinematics
|
90
|
- the initial fit parameters in the SIMC model are completely inappropriate
|
91
|
for this Q2, and need adjustment
|
92
|
- will set to zero initially
|
93
|
- GH: if this doesn't work, then find by hand some reasonable fit parameter
|
94
|
values to try initially
|
95
|
|
96
|
Ali
|
97
|
---
|
98
|
- N-Delta Transition GPDs white paper contribution for ECT* draft was sent to
|
99
|
collaborators and when feedback is returned he will send to everyone
|
100
|
|
101
|
- Optimizing BSA code, looking at left and right settings
|
102
|
- Q2=2.115, not every bin has enough statistics
|
103
|
- If Events<Threshold cut applied, sets these bins to zero
|
104
|
- the issue is that the SIDIS+rho fits failed if not enough events
|
105
|
- GH: Bill had to do something similar in the omega analysis, as the
|
106
|
rho+PhaseSpace fits would fail if not enough statistics, or if radiation
|
107
|
corrections were too high. This is all explained in his thesis if you
|
108
|
want
|
109
|
|
110
|
- weighted average of everything should cover empty bins for off-center
|
111
|
settings
|
112
|
- Made changes to weighted average scripts, should have plots for all
|
113
|
settings combined soon
|
114
|
|
115
|
Dave
|
116
|
----
|
117
|
hsxpfp vs delta correction for high HMS momenta
|
118
|
- looked at a subset of runs provided by Ali
|
119
|
- applied correction: delta=delta+C0*hsxpfp
|
120
|
- correction factor C0<0
|
121
|
- plot of C0 vs P_HMS shows a monotonic decrease to about 5 GeV/c, then
|
122
|
is reduced in magnitude from 5 to 6.5 GeV/c
|
123
|
- likely the reversal in trend is due to partial HMS saturation correction
|
124
|
applied to Matrix Elements
|
125
|
- 6.59 GeV/c correlation is not totally linear, did a best fit linear
|
126
|
correction, but some slight curvature remains
|
127
|
- Will provide table of numerical C0 values
|
128
|
|
129
|
- some discussion on how to implement this in hcana
|
130
|
- if recalculate hcana values on the fly, then just recalc delta with above
|
131
|
correction, and not make any modifications to hcana
|
132
|
- Richard will implement into ltsep python framework to recalculate delta
|
133
|
- fortunately, this does not affect the PionLT data, as the effect
|
134
|
disappeared when the power supply was replaced
|
135
|
|
136
|
- Final step will to be to optimize SIMC resolution for pi+n to get better
|
137
|
agreement between data and MC
|
138
|
|
139
|
Vijay
|
140
|
-----
|
141
|
Busy with making talk for conference in India
|
142
|
- EIC workshop in Bangalore
|
143
|
- Will send around draft slides in next few days
|
144
|
- Leaving for India on Feb 2. Talk is Feb 9
|
145
|
|
146
|
Nacer
|
147
|
-----
|
148
|
SHMS DC calibration
|
149
|
- resolved all bugs for KaonLT calib w/Junaid
|
150
|
- new t0 offsets needed
|
151
|
- Need to compare parameterization every few runs
|
152
|
- systematically checking groups of runs. 6638-6691 shown
|
153
|
|
154
|
- Pre-calibration X-T and new T0 (red) is usually better than post-calibration X-T
|
155
|
- this is because it over-calibrates (i.e. over-fits the wiggles in the data)
|
156
|
in particular when there are low stats
|
157
|
|
158
|
- Basically only need to calibrate t0 and that's it. This is just tedious
|
159
|
because need to check how it varies
|
160
|
- set up to check once per 8hr shift of data
|
161
|
- ~115 runs still to go, should be done around mid to late February
|
162
|
- batch jobs failing and such take a while
|
163
|
|
164
|
|
165
|
Next Meeting
|
166
|
------------
|
167
|
- Thur Feb 1 @ 15:00 Eastern/14:00 Regina
|
168
|
- KaonLT will go first
|
169
|
|