Project

General

Profile

Kaon LT Meetings » mtg_25feb06.txt

Garth Huber, 02/06/2025 06:18 PM

 
1
                 Feb 6/25 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
2
                 ---------------------------------------------
3
                                (Notes by GH)
4

    
5
                     Today: PionLT will be discussed first
6

    
7
Present
8
-------
9
Regina - Garth Huber, Alicia Postuma, Muhammad Junaid, Ali Usman, Nacer Hamdi,
10
   Vijay Kumar, Nathan Heinrich
11
CSULA - Konrad Aniol
12
FIU - Pete Markowitz
13
Virginia - Richard Trotta
14
CUA - Tanja Horn
15
JLab - Dave Gaskell
16

    
17
Short discussion on status of High Q^2 p(e,e'K+)Sigma0 analysis
18
- Richard and Tanja had a discussion
19
- There are 2 main parts to this analysis
20
  a) Sigma0 L/T-separated cross sections (where statistics allow)
21
  b) g_pKLambda and g_pKSigma coupling constant comparison
22
- Richard would appreciate Gabi and Ioana's help on the cross section analaysis
23
- GH will put Gabi and Ioana in contact with Richard
24

    
25
Junaid
26
------
27
PionLT data analysis - HMS magnetic optics
28
- currently using phi offsets=0 for both spectrometers
29
  - looked at some old files (Stephen's online analysis) and found non-zero
30
    offsets, SHMS: -8E-4 rad, HMS: 4.9E-3 rad
31
  - Richard: we discussed this before
32
    See Nov 21/24 meeting notes at:
33
      https://redmine.jlab.org/attachments/2673
34

    
35
  - agreement that the offsets are set during the ME fitting and should not
36
    change
37
  - Dave: low momentum HMS ME should come from 6 GeV era
38
  - Ali: thought Holly made a newer set of low momentum HMS ME in the 2017
39
    commissioning period
40
  - Tanja: take a look at
41
    https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php?title=12_GeV_HMS_Optics_Data
42
    this page lists ME only for >5 GeV/c from the commissioning period,
43
    nothing listed for low momentum region which must come from 6 GeV
44

    
45
- for higher energy ME, using NPS offsets, for lower energy using zero offset
46
  - Dave: *NB* will check, has seen various offset values floating around
47
- implemented NPS ME for 5.8, 6.1, 6.7 GeV/c, work still in progress for 5.6
48
  GeV/c
49

    
50
Next steps:
51
- setting up for Pass 2 Physics replay
52
  - implemented Nathan's boiling correction to Qeff script
53

    
54
Nathan
55
------
56
- no report, please send comments on WNPPC slides by email
57

    
58
Richard
59
-------
60
KaonLT Q2=4.4, W=2.74 analysis
61
- adjusted and simplified parameterization
62
  sigT=p5*exp(-|p6 t|)*QdepT
63
    where QdepT=exp*(-Q^4)/Q^2
64
  sigTT=(p13*QdepTT)*ft*sin^2(theta)
65
    where QdepTT=Q^2*exp(-Q^2)
66
  both use Wfac=1/(W^2-m^2)^2
67
- putting absolute values in the exponentials helped keep things well behaved
68
- obtain nice agreement in focal plane and physics distribution shapes between
69
  data and MC
70
- the only issue is that the ratios are 0.2-0.4
71
  - will have to adjust Wfac, we know from Q2=3.0 analysis that this made a big
72
    difference in the Data/MC ratios
73

    
74
Alicia
75
------
76
Geant4 proton absorption correction
77
- gave an overview of the PA classes defined
78
- added an option to turn/off NGC in detectors.dat
79
  - SHMS exit window is moved forward when NGC not in place
80
  - only the most dense aerogel is implemented so far
81
  - target and SHMS entrance windows are included
82
- had to add Cherenkov NPE to custom stepping action class
83

    
84
- event generation:
85
  - printed out focal plane variables for a data run into a txt file and reads
86
    into Geant4, so actual focal plane distribution is simulated
87
    - events are generated at center of LH2 target, where for the target
88
      variables
89
       Xtar=xfp + xpfp*Ztar
90
       Ytar=yfp + ypfp*Ztar
91

    
92
- S1X, S1Y, S2X, S2Y energy spectra are generated
93
  - energy deposit is >1 MeV, shape looks reasonable
94
  - applies an energy threshold per plane based on this distribution, to mimic
95
    the effect of the discriminator in the trigger
96

    
97
- very preliminary result: 6.4% proton absorption for 5 GeV/c
98
  - tried 1-10 GeV/c, get similar absorption for all proton momenta
99
  - Ali points out this is consistent with statement in John Matter's thesis
100

    
101
- starting to try different particle types
102
  - Pete: you will have to turn off pi/K decay in Geant4, since SIMC already
103
    takes the decay into account and we don't want to double correct for this
104
    - i.e. we want missing triggers due to absorption, not decay
105

    
106
- list is made of where different particles stop
107
  - can do a cross check between absorption fraction of total in spreadsheet
108
  - aerogel tray is about 15% of total absorption
109
    - *NB* indicates a need to do different calculations for different aerogel
110
      densities
111
  - NGC is about 20% of total, which imples a proton absorption correction for
112
    KaonLT closer to 5%
113
  
114
- Geant4 outputs the nuclear interaction length lambdaL per material
115
  - Geant4 numbers a bit lower than PDG except for LH2
116
  - presumably this difference is due to different temperature/pressure than
117
    Hall C cryotarget
118
    - Garth: *NB* suggests to cross check LH2 density with what is in SIMC
119
      input file
120

    
121
- some detector configuration checks that were done:
122
  - detector positions pulled from SHMS focal plane blueprint
123
  - had to convert NGC gas from CO2 to 70% Ar/30% Ne in spreadsheet
124
  - *NB* need to check what type of material is used for NGC exit window
125
  - HGC gas changed from CO2 to C4F10 in spreadsheet
126
    - *NB* Vijay will get Alicia the exact gas pressure used during KaonLT
127

    
128
- arranged with Stephen to present at Quarterly Analysis Meeting
129

    
130
- everything looks very nice!  Thanks Alicia for working on this
131

    
132
Nacer
133
-----
134
KaonLT 3.8 GeV data analysis
135
- fixed problem with SIMC normalization, MC much closer to data now, applied an
136
  ad-hoc normalization factor to more easily compare distribution shapes
137
  - Lambda data 2x higher than model
138
  - Sigma data 9x higher than model
139

    
140
- focal plane and physics distribution comparison looks good
141
  - now applying a MM cut to select Lambda region
142
  - also did a Sigma window and compared Data to MC
143

    
144
- Ali: is the MC smearing factor applied?
145
  - confirmed mc_shms_hut.f resmult=3.5 so the factor is IN
146

    
147
Next steps:
148
- more checks to confirm cuts are OK on some representative files before
149
  submitting full data job
150
  - will check RF cut and RF cut efficiencies
151
  - should add Nathan's LH2 target boiling factor to Qeff
152
  - should also add Nathan's ELLT calculation and compare to EDTM to confirm
153
    reliability of EDTM before proceeding
154

    
155
  - Nathan: here is the raw python code, let me know if it is not clear:
156

    
157
#calculate the ELLT via individual Hodoplane rates per Dave Mack technique
158
    #For details see: https://hallcweb.jlab.org/doc-private/ShowDocument?docid=1063
159
    HODOGATEWIDTH = 50/(10**9) #ns - gate width is PionLT
160
    SHMS_HodoRate = [0]*NRATEHODO
161
    SHMSTrueRate = [0]*NRATEHODO
162
    SHMSDT = [0]*NRATEHODO
163
    SHMSLT = [0]*NRATEHODO
164
    #HMS_HodoRate = [0]*NRATEHODO
165
    for iRATE in range(0, NRATEHODO): #iRATE is the number is the hodoscope plane
166
        SHMS_HodoRate[iRATE] =  SHMS_Hodo_rate_sum[iRATE]/time_sum[bcm_ix]
167
        #HMS_HodoRate[iRATE] =  HMS_Hodo_rate_sum[iRATE]/time_sum[bcm_ix]
168
        
169
        SHMSTrueRate[iRATE] = SHMS_HodoRate[iRATE]/(1 - HODOGATEWIDTH*SHMS_HodoRate[iRATE]) 
170
        #HMSTrueRate[iRATE] = HMS_HodoRate[iRATE]*(1 - HODOGATEWIDTH*HMS_HodoRate[iRATE])
171
        
172
        SHMSDT[iRATE] = SHMSTrueRate[iRATE]*HODOGATEWIDTH
173
        #HMSDT[iRATE] = HMSTrueRate[iRATE]*HODOGATEWIDTH
174

    
175
        SHMSLT[iRATE] = 1 - SHMSDT[iRATE]
176
        #HMSLT[iRATE] = 1 - HMSDT
177
    
178
    SHMS3of4ELT = SHMSLT[0]*SHMSLT[1]*SHMSLT[2]*SHMSLT[3] + SHMSDT[0]*SHMSLT[1]*SHMSLT[2]*SHMSLT[3] + SHMSLT[0]*SHMSDT[1]*SHMSLT[2]*SHMSLT[3] + SHMSLT[0]*SHMSLT[1]*SHMSDT[2]*SHMSLT[3] + SHMSLT[0]*SHMSLT[1]*SHMSLT[2]*SHMSDT[3]
179
    #HMS3of4ELT = HMSLT[0]*HMSLT[1]*HMSLT[2]*HMSLT[3] + HMSDT[0]*HMSLT[1]*HMSLT[2]*HMSLT[3] + HMSLT[0]*HMSDT[1]*HMSLT[2]*HMSLT[3] + HMSLT[0]*HMSLT[1]*HMSDT[2]*HMSLT[3] + HMSLT[0]*HMSLT[1]*HMSLT[2]*HMSDT[3]
180

    
181
 P_S1X_scaler = s_tree["P.S1X.scaler"].array()
182
        P_S1Y_scaler = s_tree["P.S1Y.scaler"].array()
183
        P_S2X_scaler = s_tree["P.S2X.scaler"].array()
184
        P_S2Y_scaler = s_tree["P.S2Y.scaler"].array()
185
        
186
        #H_S1X_scaler = s_tree["H.S1X.scaler"].array()
187
        #H_S1Y_scaler = s_tree["H.S1Y.scaler"].array()
188
        #H_S2X_scaler = s_tree["H.S2X.scaler"].array()
189
        #H_S2Y_scaler = s_tree["H.S2Y.scaler"].array()
190

    
191

    
192
Next Meeting
193
-------------
194
- Thur Feb 13 @ 15:30 Eastern/14:30 Regina
195
  - KaonLT will go first
196
  - Nathan and Alicia will be at WNPPC in Banff then, please remember to send
197
    your comments on their slides by email
198

    
199

    
200
  
201
 
202
  
203
  
204
 
(593-593/594)