Project

General

Profile

Kaon LT Meetings » mtg_25jul10.txt

Garth Huber, 07/10/2025 11:34 PM

 
1
                 July 10/25 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
2
                 -----------------------------------------------
3
                                (Notes by GH)
4

    
5
                    Today: KaonLT will be discussed first
6

    
7
Please remember to post your slides at:
8
https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
9

    
10
Present
11
-------
12
Regina - Garth Huber, Nathan Heinrich, Alicia Postuma, Muhammad Junaid,
13
   Ivan Zhenchuk, Nacer Hamdi
14
Virginia - Richard Trotta
15
Ohio - Julie Roche
16

    
17
Richard
18
-------
19
Q2=4.4 W=2.74 LT-separations
20
- now using the same simpler parameterization for all settings
21
- only showing Center SHMS settings right now
22
- in the parameterization, t_av is the average t-value over all data, while |t|
23
  is the central value for a given t-bin
24

    
25
- pion background was adjusted for all t-phi bins
26
  - previously was doing a fit of the pi+n region to determine the integral for
27
    normalization, now just summing over channels in the neutron MM-range
28
  - this gives the correct normalization now, while we noticed some obvious
29
    over subtraction last week
30
    - for pion subtraction, using 0.88<mpi<0.94 integration range, in
31
  - as a result, the oscillations in phi are smaller now
32

    
33
- with this smaller pion subtraction, still has some background underneath
34
  the Lambda peak that needs investigation
35
  - will look at improving the HGC hole cut, particularly at 10.6GeV, to reduce
36
    pion leakthrough
37
  - some t-phi bins are barely populated for Center setting (not unexpected)
38
    - however, for these settings, can't normalize to nonexistent pi+n peak
39
    - *NB* Garth: suggest to fit by hand the pion background in the Delta
40
      region to the background underneath the Lambda for these cases, taking
41
      care to avoid negative counts, should use the SIMC peak shape as a guide
42
      for how much to subtract
43
  - *NB* Nacer: if there is background remaining after pion subtraction,
44
    suggest to fit a simple polynomial to subtract it off
45

    
46
Nacer
47
-----
48
KaonLT Low Q2 LT-sep
49
- wrote 2 scripts to fit the functional params
50
  - sig_uns obtained using Koltenuk ratios, but fitting the parameters using
51
    Tanja's Fpi-2 parameterization
52

    
53
- one script uses ROOTfit and the other uses Python, comparing them to check
54
    for consistency
55
    - results the same, except for sigL param(6) which fit more stably with
56
      ROOT than Python
57
    - Nacer is giving initial params in the fit to be about 1, rather than
58
      using Tanja's thesis values
59
    - long discussion about the need to properly initialize the fit params, as
60
      fitting algorithms often find false minima
61
  - Richard: it is quite possible to end up with Ratios near 1, but in a false
62
    chi-square minimum
63
     - this is because the Ratios are based on the integrals of the
64
       distributions
65
     - *NB* to really be sure you have the correct fit, you need to compare
66
       Data and MC distributions of focal plane and physics variables.  They
67
       will converge when you have the correct fit
68
     
69
- Nacer's code made the mistake of feeding degree values into sin(thetacm)
70
  rather than radians for LT and TT, so the fits weirdly oscillate
71
  - Garth: there is no guarantee the equations from Tanja's thesis will be what
72
    eventually gives a good fit to the data, so pay attention to what the fits
73
    give you, so we can figure out what to eventually adjust
74

    
75
Junaid
76
------
77
Q2=3.85 W=2.62 LT-sep
78
- fitting Tanja's Fpi-2 parameterization as well, using Python
79
  - in sigL, keeping param(8),param(9) in denominator fixed for now, and only
80
    allowing the 3 parameters in the numerator to float
81
  - reran SIMC w/Fpi-2 parameterization
82
  - initial values in the fit were taken from Tanja's thesis, not ~1 as Nacer
83
    did
84
  - has fits, but hasn't looked at the new parameters yet
85
  - Garth: suggests to take a look at the parameters and see how they have
86
    changed, that can tell you which params to fix and which to let float or
87
    set to zero
88

    
89
- working on a Weight recalculation script, meetings planned with Richard and
90
  Bill next week
91

    
92
Nathan
93
------
94
PionLT deadtime investigations
95
- still following up on weird timing shifts identified a few months ago
96
- changed pTRIG.ROC1,2  pTRIG4_ROC1,2  PT2  timing window ranges
97
  - the changes are small, e.g. pTRIG1.ROC1 changed from 5100-6200 to 5000-6000
98
  - now T.coin.pTRIG1_ROC1_tdcTimeRaw shows a multiple peak structure
99
  - will make different versions of plot for different multiplicities to see
100
    what is going on
101

    
102
- with this change, CT vs xfp shows that the weird timing shift has gone away
103
  - not sure why, maybe ONLINE params are being called somehow?
104
    - doing a new replay to be sure
105
  - CT offset has also shifted, shouldn't have, indicates that something else
106
    has changed that shouldn't have
107

    
108
- still trying to debug code, to be sure correct DBASE are being used
109
  - not sure if last week's plots (showing no change) are right or not
110
  - maybe the explicit call to TCOIN.param had a typo?  Unfortunately, did not
111
    keep a record so no way to know
112

    
113
Alicia
114
------
115
u-channel background fitting
116
- had a discussion with Henry Klest re Pythia generator
117

    
118
- also had a discussion with Bill last week
119
  - he things it's uncorrelated 3-pi background, suggests to modify the
120
    phase-space SIMC routine rather than use Pythia
121
    - *NB* Garth: suggest to look at Appendix in Ambrozewicz thesis to figure
122
      out what to change in his derivation
123

    
124
Ivan
125
----
126
KaonLT K+ and pi+ BSA analysis
127
- random subtraction is messed up for K+, need to look at it again
128
- also messed up for pi+
129
  - the issue was that the reals window is shifted between pi+ and K+ and the
130
    randoms normalization factor was not calculated correctly
131
  - this affected pi+ BSA, and since pi+ is also used for background
132
    subtraction for K+, it also affects K+ BSA
133
  - anticipating the BSA will be closer to zero, with less randomness when
134
    randoms fixed, but of course there is no guarantee of this
135
  - *NB* Garth: suggests to try a separate pion subtraction factor for each
136
    t-bin, not a global factor at each Q2
137
    - *NB* same comments regarding background underneath the Lambda that are in
138
      Nacer comments above apply
139

    
140
- starting preparations for systematic error studies
141

    
142
Next Meeting
143
-------------
144
- Thur July 17 @ 15:30 Eastern/13:30 Regina
145
  - PionLT will go first
146

    
147

    
148
  
149
  
150
 
(696-696/696)