1
|
July 17/25 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
|
2
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
3
|
(Notes by GH)
|
4
|
|
5
|
Today: PionLT will be discussed first
|
6
|
|
7
|
Please remember to post your slides at:
|
8
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
|
9
|
|
10
|
Present
|
11
|
-------
|
12
|
Regina - Garth Huber, Muhammad Junaid, Ivan Zhenchuk, Nathan Heinrich,
|
13
|
Nacer Hamdi, Alicia Postuma
|
14
|
FIU - Pete Markowitz
|
15
|
JLab - Dave Gaskell
|
16
|
Virginia - Richard Trotta
|
17
|
Ohio - Julie Roche
|
18
|
CUA - Tanja Horn
|
19
|
|
20
|
Nathan
|
21
|
------
|
22
|
Diagnosing CT shift vs HMSxfp
|
23
|
- checked if the timing cuts make sense by looking at
|
24
|
T.coin.pTRIG4_ROC1_RawTime, etc., comparing versions w/ and w/o cuts
|
25
|
- two main peaks are seen, puzzled by their origin
|
26
|
|
27
|
- went through all timing cut parameters one by one, comparing online version
|
28
|
(w/ no shift) to offline version (w/shift), doing 500k replays for each
|
29
|
- changed adc offset, changed set of triggers used to calculate CT
|
30
|
t_coin_trignames changed from pTRIG4(HMS-ELREAL) to pTRIG3(HMS-3/4)
|
31
|
- now understands why the offset changed, ELREAL to 3/4 have different cable
|
32
|
lengths so the CT value has to be different
|
33
|
- can reproduce shift or no shift, and changed offset
|
34
|
- still need to change from pTRIG4_ROC1,2 to pTRIG3_ROC1,2
|
35
|
and TDC coin windows back to online version
|
36
|
- will have to change time windows accordingly
|
37
|
- changed all windows all at once, still need to identify exactly which cut
|
38
|
is causing the problem, likely it's related to pTRIG3,4 change
|
39
|
|
40
|
Next step will be to determine the Coin Blocking correction
|
41
|
- will look at CTime.ePiCoinTime_ROC1
|
42
|
- will compare the contribution of the shoulders in these plots to the good reals
|
43
|
and randoms region
|
44
|
- *NB* Dave: it will be easier to see the blocked events in the uncorrected
|
45
|
Raw CT, rather than the one with pathlength corrections added
|
46
|
- try to see if it looks clearer
|
47
|
- expecting you will see a time block of main coin events, and a separate
|
48
|
time block of blocked coincidences
|
49
|
- *NB* Garth: suggest to look at plots for runs with high and low rates,
|
50
|
the low rate one should have minimal coin blocking that grows with rate
|
51
|
|
52
|
Junaid
|
53
|
------
|
54
|
PionLT LT-separations
|
55
|
- completed the SIMC weight recalculation script
|
56
|
- met with Richard on Tuesday about it
|
57
|
- testing the script now
|
58
|
- shows output of 3 events, identical between SIMC and weight script
|
59
|
- would like Nacer also to check the script
|
60
|
|
61
|
Next step
|
62
|
- will rerun SIMC w/new params for 1 setting and compare output to SIMC w/old
|
63
|
params and weight recalc
|
64
|
- should have results of first few iterations by next week
|
65
|
|
66
|
Nacer
|
67
|
-----
|
68
|
KaonLT Low Q2 LT-separations
|
69
|
- zeroth iteration w/Tanja's functions and thesis params give R~0.35
|
70
|
- investigated fit param sensitivity to initial values in fit
|
71
|
- did both ROOTfit and pythonfit
|
72
|
- pythonfit is more sensitive to initial params, ROOTfit less sensitive
|
73
|
- data & MC comparo plots
|
74
|
- more deiations w/Tanja model compared to Koltenuk model
|
75
|
|
76
|
Richard
|
77
|
-------
|
78
|
KaonLT LT-separations
|
79
|
- using simpler functional forms shown last week
|
80
|
- changed Lambeda MM selection cut from 1.08<MMk<1.14 to 1.10<MMk<1.14
|
81
|
- pion background is using 0.88<MMk<0.94
|
82
|
- no further iterations done since last week
|
83
|
- ratios are near one, but show a decreasing trend with t-bin
|
84
|
- clearly there's a t-dependence difference between data and model
|
85
|
- finds that adding sin(thetacm) to LT,TT screws up the t-dependence compared
|
86
|
to without it
|
87
|
- Q2,W plots shown for Q2=4.4, W=2.74
|
88
|
- modified Wfac denominator in model
|
89
|
- Wset changed from Wcentral to Wbin, the distributions are improved
|
90
|
|
91
|
- *NB* MMk low epsilon data are slightly shifted compared to MC, offset needs
|
92
|
adjustment
|
93
|
- at high epsilon, the Lambda radiative tail is not described well by SIMC
|
94
|
- *NB* Dave: suggests to apply a different MMk offset for each t-bin, there may
|
95
|
be a residual optics effect in the data that hasn't been corrected for
|
96
|
- Nacer: Junaid and him have different MM offsets setting by setting
|
97
|
- Tanja: please double check by t-bin, as suggested by Dave
|
98
|
|
99
|
- still has an issue with sig_loeps>sig_hieps for some t-phi bins, but the
|
100
|
diference is getting smaller now
|
101
|
|
102
|
- first priorities will be to finish Q2=3.0,W=2.32, Q2=4.4, 5.5
|
103
|
- still planning on a full data replay in August
|
104
|
|
105
|
Alicia
|
106
|
------
|
107
|
u-channel analysis
|
108
|
- finding strategies to fit large bkd for MMp>1 GeV
|
109
|
- two options under consideration are modifying Ambrozewicz Xphasespace model
|
110
|
and Pythia generator
|
111
|
|
112
|
- Xphasespace
|
113
|
- Bill had suggested to modify this to include 3-pion phasespace
|
114
|
- reviewed Ambrozewicz thesis
|
115
|
- it is a uniform sampling of MX<W-mp, with weight taken from
|
116
|
Lorentz-invariant phasespace of a 2-body process in CM frame
|
117
|
- has identified where in SIMC this is calculated
|
118
|
- will look up the phasespace sources cited in thesis
|
119
|
|
120
|
- Pythia
|
121
|
- had a problem reading in Pythia events into SIMC, zero successes
|
122
|
- to help diagnose, tried to read SIMC events back into SIMC, which also had
|
123
|
some intial problems
|
124
|
- traced this to a mismatch in Pythia output compared to what SIMC wants
|
125
|
- SIMC wants spectrometer frame, Pythia outputs in LAB frame
|
126
|
- to use LAB frame input, need to set spectrometer angles to 0 in input
|
127
|
file
|
128
|
- wrote a python script to investigate mean momentum and angles of Pythia
|
129
|
output
|
130
|
- need to adjust Pythia kinematics so they correspond to what is needed by
|
131
|
SIMC
|
132
|
|
133
|
- u-channel physics discussion w/Bill @ JLab
|
134
|
- comparison of DEMP over range of xB at JLab and EIC may give verton insight
|
135
|
- cross-section scaling may be different, depending on if verton is exchanged
|
136
|
or not in the u-channel handbag diagram (where 3q are exchanged instead of
|
137
|
q-qbar as in t-channel handbag diagram)
|
138
|
- Garth cautions that baryon number is not only conserved globally, but also
|
139
|
locally in every part of the diagram
|
140
|
- in the Standard Model, baryon current is expected to be continuous, just
|
141
|
as lepton current is known to be continuous
|
142
|
- this means that the 3q exchange must carry baryon number, irrespective of
|
143
|
whether it includes a verton or not
|
144
|
|
145
|
Ivan
|
146
|
----
|
147
|
KaonLT Low Q2 BSA analysis
|
148
|
- refining cuts for final results
|
149
|
- plot of CoinTime vs MMk shows 4 distinct bands
|
150
|
- one band is clearly pi+n and pi+Delta
|
151
|
- another band is clearly K+Lambda and K+Sigma
|
152
|
- what are presumably protons are divided into two bands though, one
|
153
|
containing p+omega events and the other containing p+DIS events that
|
154
|
Alicia is trying to model
|
155
|
- *NB* Nathan: probably the RF cut is creating a gap between the omega and
|
156
|
p+DIS events
|
157
|
- suggest to make a version of the plot w/o RF cut
|
158
|
|
159
|
- SIMC doesn't fully reproduce MMk radiative tail, similar to what Richard
|
160
|
showed
|
161
|
- Garth: unless this creates a big problem, we will use it as is
|
162
|
|
163
|
- *NB* pion subtraction: need to adjust it so the region to left of Lambda peak
|
164
|
is not negative
|
165
|
- it appears to be negative in a few cases, need to investigate for each
|
166
|
t-phi bin
|
167
|
- pion background is very small in higher -t bins
|
168
|
|
169
|
Next steps
|
170
|
- setting up for systematics studies
|
171
|
- Alicia: the BSA results will not be finalized in advance of the systematics
|
172
|
checks
|
173
|
- we are using the checks to confirm that all cuts used in the analysis are
|
174
|
correct and that the binning is appropriate
|
175
|
|
176
|
Next Meeting
|
177
|
-------------
|
178
|
- Thur July 24 @ 15:30 Eastern/13:30 Regina
|
179
|
- KaonLT will go first
|
180
|
|
181
|
|
182
|
|
183
|
|
184
|
|
185
|
|
186
|
|
187
|
|