1
|
July 24/25 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
|
2
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
3
|
(Notes by GH)
|
4
|
|
5
|
Today: KaonLT will be discussed first
|
6
|
|
7
|
Please remember to post your slides at:
|
8
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
|
9
|
|
10
|
Present
|
11
|
-------
|
12
|
Regina - Garth Huber, Nathan Heinrich, Ivan Zhenchuk, Alicia Postuma,
|
13
|
Muhammad Junaid, Nacer Hamdi
|
14
|
Virginia - Richard Trotta
|
15
|
FIU - Pete Markowitz
|
16
|
JMU - Gabriel Niculescu
|
17
|
CUA - Tanja Horn
|
18
|
JLab - Dave Gaskell
|
19
|
Ohio - Julie Roche
|
20
|
|
21
|
Gabriel
|
22
|
-------
|
23
|
Sigma/Lambda analysis
|
24
|
- fitting Sigma0 yield, high epsilon KaonLT data
|
25
|
- subtracts Randoms, MT, pion leakthrough
|
26
|
- use MC templates to fit Lambda, Sigma0 peaks
|
27
|
- allows to shift data by a few MeV to make peaks match
|
28
|
|
29
|
- reran SIMC w/ resmult=3.5 factor from Ali
|
30
|
- modification in shms_mchut.f
|
31
|
- compare data and MC, for pions due to greater statistics
|
32
|
- fit MM peak w/ simple Gaussian + bkd function, extract pi+n center and
|
33
|
width
|
34
|
- increase in MC peak width agrees well with Ali's values, but still much
|
35
|
narrower than data
|
36
|
- even a factor of 3.5 implies a tracking resolution >0.5mm, definitely
|
37
|
unreasonable to increase it further to better describe the data
|
38
|
|
39
|
- Junaid: it's important to remove NGC from SIMC since it was not there for
|
40
|
KaonLT running
|
41
|
- haven't done this yet, yes it's important but it will make the resolution
|
42
|
discrepancy even worse, not better
|
43
|
|
44
|
- shows plot of pi+n center vs p_SHMS, a correlation is seen, peak shifts from
|
45
|
~0.95 at low momentum to ~0.935 at high momentum
|
46
|
- Dave: we've been looking more closely recently at 2022 SHMS data, getting
|
47
|
some weird effects starting as low as p_SHMS=4 GeV/c
|
48
|
- spoke with Mark about it, apparently there are some saturation effects
|
49
|
start as low as 4 GeV/c, which is a surprise
|
50
|
- *NB* suggest to keep looking for correlations of MM peak with focal plane
|
51
|
and target variables, see if we can find a way to correct it
|
52
|
- it may be clearer to start first looking at the KaonLT Heep data
|
53
|
|
54
|
Richard
|
55
|
-------
|
56
|
Q2=4.4 KaonLT analysis
|
57
|
- looking in more detail at cut differences between high and low epsilon, both
|
58
|
to better understand where sig_lo>sig_hi is coming from and for systematics
|
59
|
study
|
60
|
- sig_lo ~10% larger than sig_hi for many bins
|
61
|
- the main differences between high and low epsilon are:
|
62
|
- no right SHMS for low epsilon
|
63
|
- HGC hole cut larger for high epsilon
|
64
|
- asked GH about HGC hole cuts
|
65
|
- Vijay's study was for the low epsilon data with smaller HGC hole
|
66
|
- had done a quick set of HGC cuts for thesis, now need to do a more
|
67
|
careful study
|
68
|
|
69
|
- looking at lambda peak, clearly there is an extra bkd not included in the
|
70
|
pion subtraction
|
71
|
- Garth: *NB* the difference between data and pion leakthrough curve to left
|
72
|
of Lambda peak is nonzero but nearly flat, could try fitting a flat bkd fit
|
73
|
to 1.02<MM<1.07 region and subtract it off
|
74
|
- Alicia has a better idea: the pion bkd underneath Lambda has a different
|
75
|
t-dependence than pi+n
|
76
|
- normalizing to pi+n peak can lead to an undersubtraction of bkd beneath
|
77
|
Lambda
|
78
|
- *NB* suggest to scale pion bkd to region left of Lambda (1.02 to 1.08),
|
79
|
it will oversubtract pi+ region but probably give a cleaner result in
|
80
|
Lambda region
|
81
|
- Nacer: usually people try to fit bkd with a polynomial
|
82
|
- Richard: *NB* will try a bunch of different subtraction methods, we will
|
83
|
choose a favorite one for the final result and use the others as part of
|
84
|
the systematics calculation
|
85
|
|
86
|
Nacer
|
87
|
-----
|
88
|
KaonLT Q2=0.5 LT-sep
|
89
|
- doing SIMC weight recalculation script checks
|
90
|
- using Junaid's new weight script
|
91
|
- Richard: has a script that moves files from volatile to cache and copies each
|
92
|
instance in a different directory, it's very useful when doing iterations
|
93
|
|
94
|
Ivan
|
95
|
----
|
96
|
KaonLT Q2=0.5 BSA
|
97
|
- plots of MM for each t-phi bin
|
98
|
- Green=K+ w/dummy subtraction, Red=pion subtraction, Violet=K+ randoms
|
99
|
Blue=K+ after all subtractions
|
100
|
- for pion bkd normalization, there are no pi+n events at higher -t, using
|
101
|
closest t-bin for the normalization
|
102
|
- get a bit of under/over subtraction in Lambda region
|
103
|
- there is no bin where the oversubtraction is very large, planning to deal
|
104
|
with this as a systematic uncertainty
|
105
|
|
106
|
- new BSA uncertainty calculation
|
107
|
- instead of using bkd-subtracted yields, derive a new formula where pion bkd,
|
108
|
randoms and Lambda before subtractions are explicitly included
|
109
|
P=pion bkd, R=randoms
|
110
|
- Alicia and Ivan independenty derived the same formula
|
111
|
- now get positive definite results everywhere, even for cases where the bkd
|
112
|
is large, while previously there were some cases with sqrt(negative number)
|
113
|
|
114
|
- plot of sig_LT' vs t
|
115
|
- fit BSA with new errors vs phi
|
116
|
- some outlier points due to sqrt(negative number) fixed, leads to slightly
|
117
|
different BSA values when combining L,C,R SHMS settings
|
118
|
- BSA now has fewer fluctuations, sinusoidal curve more noticeable now
|
119
|
- LT' errors are larger now with new formula
|
120
|
|
121
|
- will refine scripts and continue systematic studies
|
122
|
|
123
|
Alicia
|
124
|
------
|
125
|
u-channel: feeding Pythia into SIMC
|
126
|
- trying for Q2=3, W=3.14 SHMS center setting
|
127
|
|
128
|
- Pythia inputs: xmin=0.15, xmax=0.35, ymin=0.56, ymax=0.66
|
129
|
- can control the electron with kinematic inputs, but not so much the proton
|
130
|
- the desired u-channel data is at end of proton momentum distribution
|
131
|
- added a new flag to keep only p_SHMS>5.4 GeV/c
|
132
|
- fortunately theta_proton is centered on SHMS acceptance
|
133
|
|
134
|
- Henry Klest had modified pythia6_eic.f to define program inputs and outputs
|
135
|
- added ePmin - event not saved if proton momentum too low
|
136
|
- skipping the generation of exclusive events, since these are already in
|
137
|
SIMC
|
138
|
- 1M evts run in ~5 min, produce 1k evts after cuts
|
139
|
- an annoyance is that the Pythia script doesn't allow it to run in bkd, need a
|
140
|
terminal prompt every few minutes to keep iFarm connection from dying
|
141
|
- have to keep jobs <1M evts
|
142
|
|
143
|
- result: 5M evts in Pythia give 5k evts after cuts, of these 311 make it
|
144
|
through SIMC
|
145
|
- mostly not making the proton arm, investigating
|
146
|
- checking Pythia acceptance variables
|
147
|
- SHMS_ypfp looks like an issue
|
148
|
- HMS_ypfp not centered at zero, most events are rejected
|
149
|
|
150
|
- result: 20M Pythia evnts, 19k output, 1233 SIMC events
|
151
|
- the MM shape looks reasonable, still need to do detailed comparo w/data
|
152
|
|
153
|
Junaid
|
154
|
------
|
155
|
PionLT LT-sep preparations
|
156
|
- using Tanja's functional form
|
157
|
- in sigL, p7 in exponential and p8,p9 in denominator are all fixed for now
|
158
|
- fitting all other parameters
|
159
|
|
160
|
- weight recalc script, appplying to SIMC file output by recon_hcana
|
161
|
- Dave: it's important to use Ratio method to recalculate the weight, to
|
162
|
retain radiative correction, virtual flux factor, Jacobian
|
163
|
- Weight=sigCM*Jacobian*GammaFlux*RadCorr
|
164
|
- Weight_new=sigCM_new/sigCM_old*Weight_old
|
165
|
- tried one iteration, ratios jumped from ~1 to ~40, clearly an error in the
|
166
|
weight recalculation script
|
167
|
- *NB* recon_hcana does not touch the weight or cross section, no other
|
168
|
corrections are necessary that are not in the above equations
|
169
|
|
170
|
Nathan
|
171
|
------
|
172
|
PionLT coin deadtime investigations
|
173
|
- still debugging weird CT issues
|
174
|
- finally has a straight CT line vs xfp_HMS
|
175
|
- now using pTRIG4(HMS-ELREAL) instead of pTRIG3(HMS-3/4)
|
176
|
- changed time window cuts slightly execpt for HT2, PT2
|
177
|
- now using a cut on HT2, no cut on PT2
|
178
|
- still needs to check that PT2 did not screw up SHMS
|
179
|
- Dave: only need cuts on quantities used to calculate CoinTime
|
180
|
- should use 1 and 3, ELREAL should have same timing as 3/4, the difference
|
181
|
is only on extra PID info
|
182
|
- *NB* will try PT3 cuts intead of PT4, and check SHMS
|
183
|
|
184
|
- once has a set of runs with no CT anomalies, will start CoinBlocking study
|
185
|
- will do a write up for RedMine
|
186
|
|
187
|
Next Meeting
|
188
|
-------------
|
189
|
- Thur July 31 @ 15:30 Eastern/13:30 Regina
|
190
|
- PionLT will go first
|
191
|
|
192
|
|
193
|
|
194
|
|
195
|
|