1
|
Aug 21/25 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
|
2
|
----------------------------------------------
|
3
|
(Notes by GH)
|
4
|
|
5
|
Today: PionLT will be discussed first
|
6
|
|
7
|
Please remember to post your slides at:
|
8
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
|
9
|
|
10
|
Present
|
11
|
-------
|
12
|
Regina - Garth Huber, Nathan Heinrich, Ivan Zhenchuk, Muhammad Junaid,
|
13
|
Nacer Hamdi
|
14
|
Virginia - Richard Trotta
|
15
|
CUA - Chi Kin Tam
|
16
|
|
17
|
Nathan
|
18
|
------
|
19
|
PionLT Lumi analysis
|
20
|
- ran into some bugs when porting recent TDC cut changes to Lumi analysis
|
21
|
scripts
|
22
|
- confirmed that cut file changes are incorporated correctly, works now
|
23
|
- ifarm changes: needed to add manual load of data from tape silo to analysis
|
24
|
scripts, rather than being done automatically
|
25
|
- should have new Lumi plots by end of week
|
26
|
- working on report of analysis changes
|
27
|
- will have a meeting with Mark Jones next week on variables, e.g. not sure
|
28
|
if cut on HT2 is needed or not
|
29
|
|
30
|
Junaid
|
31
|
------
|
32
|
Q2=3.85 LT-sep
|
33
|
- extended t-plotting range of functional form fits, as suggested by Dave last
|
34
|
week
|
35
|
- now see that sigL went very high at low -t, below fitting range, which
|
36
|
explains why the ratios were bad even though the function fits looked good
|
37
|
- set LT,TT=0, also in sigL set p7=0 in exp(p6-p7*ln(Q^2))*(-t)
|
38
|
but no change in other parameters
|
39
|
- that means the subtraction term in the exponent is removed, ratios got
|
40
|
worse, which makes sense
|
41
|
- trying a different functional form for sigL
|
42
|
- Bosted parameterization uses
|
43
|
sigL=(p5+p6/Q2)*-t/(t-mpi^2)*Q2*exp(p7*|t|)/(1+p8*Q2+p9*Q4)
|
44
|
where p9 is small
|
45
|
- using Bosted's input parameters for sigL, sigT stays as before from Tanja,
|
46
|
got Data/MC ratios ~5 instead of ~30, with a phi-dependent ratio
|
47
|
- first iteration with the new functional form is in progress
|
48
|
- if it looks good, then will look more at LT,TT functions to use
|
49
|
|
50
|
Nacer
|
51
|
-----
|
52
|
KaonLT Q2=0.50 LT-sep
|
53
|
- trying different functional forms
|
54
|
- previously was using Fpi-2 pi+ functions, now switching to K+ functions in
|
55
|
sig_factorized_2007 (extension by Tanja of older Koltenuk model)
|
56
|
- only using sigT, setting L=LT=TT=0 since the epsilon dependence is much
|
57
|
less than for pi+n
|
58
|
- Data/MC ratio using initial params from sig_factorized_2007 is ~40,
|
59
|
puzzled since earlier SIMC studies had R~2
|
60
|
- Garth: I believe your earlier SIMC studies used Koltenuk's
|
61
|
sig_factorized, not sig_factorized_2007, so you should check this
|
62
|
- doing some checks to confirm that SIMC and weight recalc scripts give
|
63
|
same intermediate result
|
64
|
- one good thing is that the kinematic and focal plane distributions have
|
65
|
better agreement between data and MC with new functions than before
|
66
|
|
67
|
Ivan
|
68
|
----
|
69
|
KaonLT BSA analysis
|
70
|
- still writing Co-Op term refport, full draft by end of week
|
71
|
|
72
|
Richard
|
73
|
-------
|
74
|
KaonLT Q2=4.4 LT-sep
|
75
|
- fit studies for bkd underneath Lambda peak and Sigma0 region at higher MM
|
76
|
- revised cut to 1.10<mK<1.14, back down from 1.16
|
77
|
- thinks 1.14 cut is better as Sigma0 fit is then not needed
|
78
|
- pi+n region is selected with 0.88<mpi<0.94
|
79
|
|
80
|
- with initial param fits (IT=0) with 1.14 cut, no Sigma0 fit
|
81
|
- Data/MC ratios near 1 with some phi oscillation at low -t
|
82
|
- then do 3 iterations, sig_uns determined from Data/MC ratios changed hugely,
|
83
|
particularly around phi~180deg
|
84
|
- some high epsilon t-phi bins have very small errors, which could be driving
|
85
|
the fits in weird directions
|
86
|
- Richard will show some slides next week on the explicit calculation of
|
87
|
uncertainties so we can see if they're done correctly
|
88
|
|
89
|
- starting on Q2=3.0, W=2.32 bkd subtraction checks
|
90
|
- background underneath Lambda peak is more significant than at Q2=4.4
|
91
|
- Chebyshev 2nd order polynomial appears to be doing a good job
|
92
|
|
93
|
- Junaid: when you do parameter fitting, do you apply fitting bounds?
|
94
|
- Yes, but in a complicated sense. The fitting script is automated, start
|
95
|
with very wide parameter bounds then they get narrower in refits (in same
|
96
|
iteration).
|
97
|
- also applies a chisq<3 criterion
|
98
|
|
99
|
Cin Kin
|
100
|
-------
|
101
|
KaonLT Q2=2.115, W=2.95 LT-sep
|
102
|
- will start with bkd subtraction and fitting
|
103
|
- right now: running SIMC, applying general cuts (PID, CT, ...), applying MM
|
104
|
shifts
|
105
|
- writing code for background subtraction
|
106
|
- found an error in the charge uncertainty calculation
|
107
|
- Dave Mack specifies 0.5% + 0.15/I in quadrature
|
108
|
- erroneous code had a simple sum instead of quadrature and a decimal place
|
109
|
error in the coefficient
|
110
|
- Richard will propagate this correction to his code too
|
111
|
|
112
|
Garth
|
113
|
-----
|
114
|
pi+n BSA PLB changes
|
115
|
- shows new version of Fig 4, xB vs Q2 data points
|
116
|
- made CLAS, CLAS-12 points smaller, changed shading of CLAS-12 bin regions
|
117
|
- also added error bars (large) to CLAS-6 data, indicating the huge regions
|
118
|
over which they are binned
|
119
|
- Nacer found the plot to be confusing, the meaning of the shaded regions was
|
120
|
unclear, also skeptical of the value of including any CLAS-6 data given the
|
121
|
large binning regions
|
122
|
|
123
|
Next Meeting
|
124
|
-------------
|
125
|
- Thur Aug 28 @ 15:30 Eastern/13:30 Regina
|
126
|
- KaonLT will go first
|
127
|
|
128
|
_ Note: we will need to do a poll soon, to pick a time for September
|
129
|
|
130
|
|
131
|
|
132
|
|
133
|
|
134
|
|
135
|
|
136
|
|
137
|
|
138
|
|
139
|
|
140
|
|
141
|
|
142
|
|
143
|
|
144
|
|
145
|
|
146
|
|
147
|
|
148
|
|
149
|
|
150
|
|
151
|
|