|
1
|
Oct 23-24/25 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
|
|
2
|
-------------------------------------------------
|
|
3
|
(Notes by GH)
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
Today: KaonLT will be discussed first
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
Please remember to post your slides at:
|
|
8
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
Thursday: Present
|
|
11
|
-----------------
|
|
12
|
Regina - Garth Huber, Nathan Heinrich, Muhammad Junaid, Alicia Postuma,
|
|
13
|
Nermin Sadoun, Vijay Kumar
|
|
14
|
CUA - Chi Kin Tam, Tanja Horn, BC Manoj
|
|
15
|
JLab - Dave Gaskell
|
|
16
|
Virginia - Richard Trotta
|
|
17
|
Ohio - Julie Roche
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
Richard
|
|
20
|
-------
|
|
21
|
KaonLT - checking phi calculation in SIMC
|
|
22
|
- SIMC version of phi_lab goes from -pi to +pi
|
|
23
|
- if phi<0, add 2pi. It's important not to add pi to all angles, as this
|
|
24
|
screws up the 0 to pi part.
|
|
25
|
- thetapq, thetapqi - reconstructed and vertex theta_pq quantities
|
|
26
|
- thetacm - vertex angle in CM frame
|
|
27
|
- many thetacm values are zero or NaN even though other variables are fine
|
|
28
|
- still investigating
|
|
29
|
- Vijay: saw the same thing, seems that thetacm is not output for every event
|
|
30
|
- Junaid: does not see this problem
|
|
31
|
- *NB* it's important to add this variable to results_write.f in SIMC
|
|
32
|
- check with Junaid for instructions, if needed
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- Peter Bosted's email about phi
|
|
35
|
- Dave did a quick test, the difference between old and new phi calcs is very
|
|
36
|
small, both definitions appear to be consistent
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
Chi Kin
|
|
39
|
-------
|
|
40
|
Q2=4.4 data analysis
|
|
41
|
- comparing #counts after cuts w/Richard
|
|
42
|
- purposefully removed pion and random subtractions, still have a yield
|
|
43
|
difference
|
|
44
|
- effective chage is same for Left, Center but different for Right
|
|
45
|
- looks like some runs were missed in the replay
|
|
46
|
- have not yet compared HGC hole cut effects
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
Alicia
|
|
49
|
------
|
|
50
|
u-channel analysis
|
|
51
|
- PYTHIA simulations
|
|
52
|
- found that Pythia does a poor job for the Q2=3.0, W=2.32 setting
|
|
53
|
- MM distributions have extra structures not seen for higher W settings
|
|
54
|
- looked at correlations of MM with other variables
|
|
55
|
- e.g. additional lines appear in MM vs hsyptar
|
|
56
|
- it really looks like a resonance or some exclusive process is included
|
|
57
|
- *NB* Garth: suggest to compare Pythia to data, perhaps the data have the same
|
|
58
|
structrues at this W?
|
|
59
|
- if not, then try comparing to Xphsp simulation, at this lower W the MM
|
|
60
|
coverage of the simulatino might be sufficient
|
|
61
|
|
|
62
|
Junaid
|
|
63
|
------
|
|
64
|
PionLT analysis
|
|
65
|
- replayed all PionLT data after Nathan's new report files (for CoinBlocking
|
|
66
|
corr)
|
|
67
|
- will look into phi issue next
|
|
68
|
|
|
69
|
Nathan
|
|
70
|
------
|
|
71
|
PionLT Lumi analysis
|
|
72
|
- working on a write-up of the results, hopes to share a draft next week
|
|
73
|
--
|
|
74
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
76
|
Friday: present
|
|
77
|
---------------
|
|
78
|
Regina - Garth Huber, Alicia Postuma, Nathan Heinrich, Nermin Sadoun,
|
|
79
|
Muhammad Junaid, Vijay Kumar, Nacer Hamdi
|
|
80
|
York - Stephen Kay
|
|
81
|
Glasgow - Kathleen Ramage, Rachel Montgomery
|
|
82
|
JLab - Dave Gaskell
|
|
83
|
CUA - Sameer Jain, Tanja Horn, BC Manoj
|
|
84
|
JMU - Gabriel Niculescu
|
|
85
|
Ohio - Julie Roche
|
|
86
|
Virginia - Richard Trotta
|
|
87
|
FIU - Pete Markowitz
|
|
88
|
|
|
89
|
Nacer
|
|
90
|
-----
|
|
91
|
KaonLT Q2=0.5 analysis
|
|
92
|
- following up on last week's discussion about high sensitivity to
|
|
93
|
phi-dependence when adding interference terms to LT-separation
|
|
94
|
- compared phipqi to phipq from SIMC
|
|
95
|
- for Center setting, distributions are fairly similar, except that big pekas
|
|
96
|
in phi-dists are shifted away from 90deg, 270deg
|
|
97
|
- for Left, Right settings, distributions are offset from each other by
|
|
98
|
180deg
|
|
99
|
- *NB* this is because pi was added to all angles, instead:
|
|
100
|
- for phi<0 add +2pi
|
|
101
|
- for phi>0 leave unchanged
|
|
102
|
- working on Sigma yields
|
|
103
|
|
|
104
|
Gabriel
|
|
105
|
-------
|
|
106
|
KaonLT - looking at CoinBlocking correction
|
|
107
|
|
|
108
|
Sameer
|
|
109
|
------
|
|
110
|
KaonLT - showed plots for CoinBlocking correction
|
|
111
|
- *NB* Nathan: need to get rid of weird peaks at -300 first, they look like
|
|
112
|
they're due to a bad RefTime cut
|
|
113
|
- look at T.coin.pTRIG1_ROC1_tdcTimeRaw, keeping in mind that triggers are
|
|
114
|
different between KaonLT and PionLT
|
|
115
|
pTRIG1(PionLT)=pTRIG4(KaonLT)
|
|
116
|
- suggest to start by plotting the raw timing variables and selecting proper
|
|
117
|
cuts
|
|
118
|
- only after that is done should you select the cuts for the CoinBlocking
|
|
119
|
correction
|
|
120
|
- the wide cut needs to select the base of the full distribution
|
|
121
|
|
|
122
|
Vijay
|
|
123
|
-----
|
|
124
|
Summer 2019 PionLT analysis
|
|
125
|
- CoinBlocking correction: using a 135ns window
|
|
126
|
- correction varies 87%-98% plotted vs Run Number
|
|
127
|
- *NB* Garth: please plot it vs CoinRate, so we can verify the correction
|
|
128
|
makes sense
|
|
129
|
- Nathan: if the correction is good, it should go to unity at zero rate
|
|
130
|
|
|
131
|
- presents GH's fit of VGL model to initial results
|
|
132
|
- sigT is much larger than Ackermann Q2=0.35 data
|
|
133
|
- sigLT is opposite sign to Ackermann as well
|
|
134
|
- Fpi-1 Q2=0.60 has same sign LT as Vijay, so difference appears to be
|
|
135
|
Ackermann
|
|
136
|
- VGL poorly describes the t-dependence of the sigL data
|
|
137
|
- GH followed steps similar to Fpi-1 analysis in dealing with this, a
|
|
138
|
significant model dependence uncertainty will have be assigned to the Fpi
|
|
139
|
extraction as a result
|
|
140
|
|
|
141
|
- these preliminary results do not yet have:
|
|
142
|
- CoinBlocking corr
|
|
143
|
- pion absorption corr
|
|
144
|
- *NB* Vijay also has to check aerogel tray cut in SIMC
|
|
145
|
- Junaid: the data cuts might be buried in the replay script
|
|
146
|
|
|
147
|
Next Meeting
|
|
148
|
------------
|
|
149
|
New 2-meeting/week structure
|
|
150
|
- Thurs: Oct 30 @ 16:00 Eastern/14:00 Regina
|
|
151
|
- PionLT will go first
|
|
152
|
- Fri: Oct 31 @ 11:00 Eastern/9:00 Regina
|
|
153
|
- we will continue where we left off
|
|
154
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
163
|
|