Project

General

Profile

Kaon LT Meetings » mtg_25nov13-14.txt

Garth Huber, 11/15/2025 12:55 PM

 
1
                 Nov 13-14/25 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
2
                 -------------------------------------------------
3
                               (Notes by RLT & GH)
4

    
5
                    Today: KaonLT will be discussed first
6

    
7
Please remember to post your slides at:
8
https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
9

    
10
Thursday: Present
11
----------------
12
Regina - Nathan Heinrich, Nacer Hamdi, Alicia Postuma, Nermin Sadoun
13
Virginia - Richard Trotta
14
CUA - Tanja Horn, Chi Kin Tam
15
JLab - Dave Gaskell
16
  
17
Richard
18
-------
19
KaonLT Q2=3.0, W=2.32 LT-sep
20
- Using the same functional forms as Q2=4.4, W=32.74
21
- Ratios look fairly flat with little structure. There are 2-3 bins that dip
22
  and need investigation
23
  - The distributions look okay overall, but more iterations will be needed
24
    (currently only 3). The delta distributions, in particular, are a bit off.
25
  
26
- New outline for analysis going forward
27
  - Finish and refine Q2=3.0/W=2.32, Q2=4.4/W=2.74,Q2=5.5/W=2.95 (scaling
28
    settings)
29
  - Then work on the fit algorithm paper and studies (fitting Fpi1/2, low Q2
30
    Pion-KaonLT, etc.  data)
31
  - Chi Kin to finish up Q2=3.0/W=3.14  
32
    - Then finish cross section systematics checks on these settings 
33
  - Once Sameer is finished up with cointime blocking correction, a final full
34
    replay will be done
35
    - With the full replay finished, Richard will check and finalize
36
      systematics
37

    
38
Chi Kin
39
-------
40
KaonLT Q2=3.0, W=3.14 analysis
41
- Rebinning in t and adjusting t-range 
42
  - Showed average t per bin vs t bin center
43
- Same functional form as Richard
44
  - Initial parameters determined from distributions
45
- 0th iteration lookd reasonable with high > low eps in unseparated cross
46
  sections
47
   - Shape a bit odd for sigT and just one iteration dramatically changes the
48
     cross sections and ratios look much worse
49
   - Unphysical parameters (local minima likely) result in a negative total
50
     cross section
51
   - Will be using Richard's fit algorithm for a better set of initial
52
     parameters
53
   
54
   - Nathan: given the plots, how can the total cross section be negative?
55
     - Likely a bug in the code because the 0th iteration overall looks very
56
       reasonable (unspe/ratios/sep/kin/etc).
57
     - *NB* GH: it's important to plot cross sections over the full kinematic
58
       range of the data, not just the range spanned by the nominal t-values of
59
       the bins.  Maybe the parameterization is doing something weird on the
60
       edge of the distribution?
61
       
62
 - Discussion if Kin should shift data and simc MM to lambda mass of 1.115
63
   or just shift MM data to simc.
64
   - Tanja: simc is "truth" so data should shift to it
65

    
66
Alicia
67
------
68
pi+n BSA PLB paper
69
- Has been accepted, there are a few, brief comments from one referee
70
  - There's some confusion about exact coverage and correlation of kinematics
71
    for different settings
72
    - Garth suggested adding a t-phi plot but space is limited.
73
      - Tanja suggested a reference to previous LT papers
74
      - what Garth actually meant was to put the plot in the supplemental
75
        material, not the paper
76
  - Referee unsure why bin widths are indicated by standard deviation instead
77
    of just edge of each bin
78
    - Alicia and Garth have showed to our group the different methods so just
79
       explaining to referee is probably fine
80
  - Radiation corrections are still not discussed in text
81
    - Alicia is expanding some of the text
82
  - Fix Q2/x but correlated with t
83
    - Leave as it
84
  - Proper citations
85
    - PLB Website issues
86
  - Figure 7: GK model has shows such strong dependence on Q2
87
    - Alicia: scaling of denominator to show dependence, but is that worth
88
      doing?
89
      - Tanja: Probably fine as is, not a theory paper
90
  - Various minor edits to wording, etc.
91
    - No comments, looks good
92
- expect to submit final version for publication in a few days
93

    
94
Nacer
95
-----
96
KaonLT Q2=0.5 LT-sep
97
- Verbal: Trying to improve ratios with continued adjustments
98

    
99
Nathan
100
------
101
PionLT finishing up CoinLumi studies
102
- Showed coin yield vs current
103
  - Using Dave's previous suggestion, fit to constant 
104
  - No chi2 yet from Nathan, Dave says that should be first step. 
105
    - If good chi2 then statistically consistent with a constant so no systematic
106
      correction.
107
    - If bad, then need to think about systematic. Possibly, amplify error bar
108
      until good chi2 achieved then quantify that amplification.
109
  - Friday update: did a combined fit using error-weighted average, get flat vs
110
    rate within ~1 sigma
111
    - Note added after meeting: Nathan finds that adding 0.72% to the error bars
112
      results in a reduced Chi-square of 1.  Dave and Garth agree the adjusted
113
      plots look good  
114

    
115
- Coinblock corr vs coin rate
116
  - A bit of a spread, but trends per setting are consistent
117
    - Two settings (Nathan's categorization, exclusive lumi 3 vs 4/5) should be
118
      the same but aren't. Someone may have adjusted the electronics, but no
119
      log entry on this.
120
      - Garth has no recollection of any such electronics changes during the run
121
      - One other point is off trend, but error bars are large so likely low
122
       statistics run.
123

    
124

    
125
Friday: Present
126
---------------
127
Regina - Garth Huber, Nathan Heinrich, Alicia Postuma, Muhammad Junaid,
128
   Vijay Kumar, Nacer Hamdi
129
CSULA - Konrad Aniol
130
FIU - Pete Markowitz
131
Virginia - Richard Trotta
132
CUA - Tanja Horn, Chi Kin Tam, Sameer Jain
133
JMU - Gabriel Niculescu
134
York - Stephen Kay
135
Ohio - Julie Roche
136

    
137
Vijay
138
-----
139
New Low Q2 PionLT results
140
- CoinTime blocking and pion absorption corrections now included for both Q2
141
  - pion absoprtion correction: 2.02%+/-0.045% (see June 5/25 slides),
142
    correction is applied by dividing by 0.979
143
- Q2=0.375 results
144
  - mid epsilon Data/MC ratios: 0.9-1.2 with some scatter
145
  - Rosenbluth fit of sig_uns has smaller chi-square than before
146
  - 5-10 iterations done after corrections applied
147
- Q2=0.425 results
148
  - mid epsilon Data/MC ratios: some larger ratios at edges of phi-dist, 0 and
149
    360 deg
150
  - TT trends to 0 at -t=0.01, LT is constant (not zero) at -t=0.01
151
  - sigL vs t is less smooth than at Q2=0.375, big jump for lowest t-bin
152
- next steps:
153
  - working on systematic uncertainties
154
  - preparing kinematics and acceptance plots for next week
155
  - will send tar files of results to spokespersons
156

    
157
Sameer
158
------
159
KaonLT CoinTime blocking at 6.2, 8.2, 10.6 GeV beam energies
160
- still need ROOT files for Q2=4.4 (10.6 GeV)
161
- no error bars yet
162

    
163
- blocking corr @ Q2=3.0, W=3.14
164
  - get 3 parallel bands vs Rate with values of 0.92, 0.93, 0.94
165
  - *NB* Garth: this seems weird, is it a round off issue when calculating the
166
    ratio?
167
- blocking corr @ Q2=5.5, W=3.02
168
  - high epsilon shows a band at 0.78, with rest at 0.85
169
  - *NB* Nathan: concerned that the timing window is not set correctly for
170
    these
171
    - maybe standard.database is not pointing to the correct file for these
172
     runs?
173
  - low epsilon shows some corrections of 0.4 at low rate
174
    - *NB* Nathan: this needs more investigation, compare the shape of timing
175
      plots for good and bad runs
176
      - if shapes are similar, the correction can't be very different
177
      - if shapes are different, then need to confirm the applied cuts are
178
        correct
179
  - *NB* Garth: please show sufficient information next time that we can help
180
    you determine what might be wrong
181

    
182
Junaid
183
------
184
PionLT Q2=3.85, W=2.62 LT-sep
185
- working on pion absorption correction following Alicia's instructions
186
  - turned on NGC in Geant4 code
187
  - set Aerogel tray to n=1.011 thickness
188
  - ran 100k events
189
  - applied default cuts should be okay for this configuration
190
  - resulting correction is similar to Vijay's but there are more secondary
191
    particles produced due to the higher momentum
192
  - *NB* Garth: please give more info next time on how the secondaries are
193
    handled in your Geant4 analysis
194
- all other corrections are applied to the data
195

    
196

    
197
Next Week Meetings
198
------------------
199
- Thurs: Nov 20 @ 16:00 Eastern/15:00 Regina
200
  - PionLT will go first
201
    
202
- Fri: Nov 21 @ 11:00 Eastern/10:00 Regina
203
  - we will continue where we left off
204

    
205
  
206
  
207
  
(782-782/784)