|
1
|
Apr 9-10/26 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
|
|
2
|
------------------------------------------------
|
|
3
|
(Notes by GH)
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
Today: KaonLT will be discussed first
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
Thursday: Present
|
|
8
|
-----------------
|
|
9
|
Regina - Garth Huber, Alicia Postuma, Nathan Heinrich, Vijay Kumar,
|
|
10
|
Nacer Hamdi, Muhammad Junaid, Nermin Sadoun
|
|
11
|
Virginia - Richard Trotta
|
|
12
|
CUA - Tanja Horn, Chi Kin Tam, Sameer Jain
|
|
13
|
Ohio - Julie Roche
|
|
14
|
FIU - Pete Markowitz
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
Chi Kin
|
|
17
|
-------
|
|
18
|
KaonLT high Q2 analysis
|
|
19
|
- double checking differences between high and low epsilon data
|
|
20
|
- improved HGC hole cut, based on a plot of HGC efficiency vs
|
|
21
|
hgcer.xAtCer,yAtCer
|
|
22
|
- does not resolve MM shift at high epsilon, but now the pion bkd underneath
|
|
23
|
Lambda peak is less, should result in smaller systematic uncertainty in the
|
|
24
|
bkd subtraction
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- double checking HMS matrix elements
|
|
27
|
- 2018 ME instead of NPS used
|
|
28
|
- still checking on correct value of hphi_offset to use for both
|
|
29
|
spectrometers
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
- redid t-binning
|
|
32
|
- increased lower and upper limits of used t-range
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- new SIMC event processing script
|
|
35
|
- did not like how long it took to reweight SIMC events after each iteration
|
|
36
|
- changed to pre-process SIMC events as a table in Qi,ti bin indices and
|
|
37
|
weight
|
|
38
|
- all operations are vectorized, one-shot reweighting
|
|
39
|
- reweighting is now nearly instantaneous, takes 2min instead of 2 hrs
|
|
40
|
- takes some work to set up initially, but gain that investment back in speed
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
- systematics studies
|
|
43
|
- varied upper end of MMmax cut from 1.12 to 1.19
|
|
44
|
- cut below 1.14 has poor statistics, 1.14 is the nominal cut used
|
|
45
|
- yields from 1.14 to 1.17 look vairly stable
|
|
46
|
- *NB* Tanja: please look at how sigU=sigT+epsilon*sigL varies w/cut
|
|
47
|
- *NB* Garth: the nominal MM cut should really be near the middle of the
|
|
48
|
varied MM cut range, this indicates that your nominal MMmax is too low
|
|
49
|
- also suggested the same last week, the high sensitivity to the radiation
|
|
50
|
correction on/off is due to the MM cut being too tight
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
Richard
|
|
53
|
-------
|
|
54
|
KaonLT high Q2 replays
|
|
55
|
- set up several sets of replay
|
|
56
|
pass4: testing
|
|
57
|
pass4a: the new April 2026 replay
|
|
58
|
pass4b: will be done after the Matrix Elements question (above) is settled
|
|
59
|
- planning to use hphi_offset=0
|
|
60
|
|
|
61
|
- Nacer: is the CoinTimeBlock Correction working properly in your new report
|
|
62
|
files? In my new replay, the output variables are zero. Still trying to
|
|
63
|
figure out what is wrong
|
|
64
|
- Richard will check more carefully, and they will meet offline if needed
|
|
65
|
|
|
66
|
- new skim_ROOTFiles
|
|
67
|
- 7 branches: no cuts, 3 for RF cut, 3 for no RF cut
|
|
68
|
- the 3 for RF cut can be removed, since RFcut is not used for this analysis
|
|
69
|
|
|
70
|
- Everyone should note: collected batch submission scripts in farm template
|
|
71
|
area on GitHub
|
|
72
|
- added new diagnostic tools for failed Run Codes
|
|
73
|
- SWIF2 jobs are much faster, data written to node, so many fewer
|
|
74
|
communication bottlenecks that slowed down jobs
|
|
75
|
|
|
76
|
- need to update efficiency scripts to include CoinBlocking
|
|
77
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
79
|
Nacer
|
|
80
|
-----
|
|
81
|
KaonLT low Q2 analysis
|
|
82
|
- cleaning and organizing scripts used to compute yields
|
|
83
|
- ran a replay including brances for CoinTimeBlocking studies
|
|
84
|
- addition of blocking factor to script gave zeros, sill investigating
|
|
85
|
|
|
86
|
Sameer
|
|
87
|
------
|
|
88
|
PionLT Q2=1.6 W=3.08 low epsilon (2022) THshsms=5.50deg PID studies
|
|
89
|
- HMS cuts: Hcer>1.5 Hcal>0.7
|
|
90
|
- *NB* Tanja: before finalizing the cuts, need to find out the cut efficiency
|
|
91
|
for these values
|
|
92
|
- Hcal efficiency requires a special analysis. Junaid sent out an
|
|
93
|
efficiency report explaining the method
|
|
94
|
- SHMS cuts:
|
|
95
|
- Junaid: the appropriate aerogel tray cuts for each n-index are
|
|
96
|
automatically selected in the replay script, only need to confirm that they
|
|
97
|
are applied correctly
|
|
98
|
- Nathan: link to the "good" replay script which picks the def-cuts file for
|
|
99
|
you based onAerogel tray
|
|
100
|
https://github.com/heinricn/hallc_replay_lt/blob/master/SCRIPTS/COIN/PRODUCTION/PionLT_REPLAY/FullReplay_PionLT_Phys_Prod.C
|
|
101
|
|
|
102
|
- PCal: after CoinTime prompt cut is applied, a noticeable peak at 1 remains,
|
|
103
|
which is a bit surprising
|
|
104
|
- *NB* Note added by GH after more thought: Given the small SHMS angle, and
|
|
105
|
the low Q2 of this setting, it is conceivable that e+e- real coincidences
|
|
106
|
from vector meson decay are being detected with small probability. It is
|
|
107
|
the only way he can think of e+e- pairs surviving the CoinTime cut. If
|
|
108
|
so, these events should be excluded when the Q2-W diamond cut is applied
|
|
109
|
Please make a note to check this again later
|
|
110
|
- Coin PID cuts:
|
|
111
|
- *NB* suggestions to make plots of RFtime vs MM and PCal vs MM
|
|
112
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
114
|
Friday: Present
|
|
115
|
---------------
|
|
116
|
Regina - Garth huber, Vijay Kumar, Nacer Hamdi, Muhammad Junaid, Nermin Sadoun,
|
|
117
|
Nathan Heinrich, Alicia Postuma
|
|
118
|
Virginia - Richard Trotta
|
|
119
|
JMU - Gabriel Niculescu
|
|
120
|
CUA - Tanja Horn, Chi Kin Tam
|
|
121
|
Glasgow - Kathleen Ramage
|
|
122
|
FIU - Pete Markowitz
|
|
123
|
Ohio - Julie Roche
|
|
124
|
York - Stephen Kay
|
|
125
|
|
|
126
|
Alicia
|
|
127
|
------
|
|
128
|
KaonLT u-channel shape study
|
|
129
|
- data are binned in 3 u bins (0-0.06, 0.06-0.12, 0.12-0.40), 8 phi bins
|
|
130
|
- first make plots for each u-bin (phi integrated) of:
|
|
131
|
- bkd subtracted data vs omega MC
|
|
132
|
- rho vs omega subtracted data (for lowest -u bin, where only rho MC
|
|
133
|
contributes, no Xphasespace)
|
|
134
|
- residuals (data-omega-bkd) vs MM
|
|
135
|
- then separate into plots for each phi bin
|
|
136
|
- middle u-bin: pi+n leakthrough has a notable phi-dependence
|
|
137
|
- large u-bin: Xphasespace has significant contribution, residuals are worse
|
|
138
|
for MM>1.0GeV, fit range goes up to 1.2GeV
|
|
139
|
- added a print box to indicate the exclusion criterion triggered (when it
|
|
140
|
happens)
|
|
141
|
- some bins have an extended omega tail, still need to implement radiation
|
|
142
|
criterion (if SIMC indicates most of omega peak comes from radiation, not
|
|
143
|
from single photon exchange, the bin should be excluded)
|
|
144
|
|
|
145
|
- plans to do a Pass4b (as Richard's) for proton kinematics
|
|
146
|
- also needs to look at the SHMS proton collimator routine in SIMC, this might
|
|
147
|
be needed for the proper modeling of the extended omega tail
|
|
148
|
|
|
149
|
Vijay
|
|
150
|
-----
|
|
151
|
PionLT low Q2 analysis
|
|
152
|
- applied t-shift to Q2=0.375, then did 5 iterations
|
|
153
|
- sigL: first 3 t-bins are now much flatter, possibly some evidence of
|
|
154
|
turn-over at -t<0.02
|
|
155
|
- had to change sigL fit function to account for this, as previous function
|
|
156
|
could not reproduce the turnover
|
|
157
|
- sigT: changed to a linear t-dependence
|
|
158
|
- Data/MC ratios: eps=0.25 have a noticeable phi-dependence in t-bin #4
|
|
159
|
- eps=0.63, 0.75 plots are much flatter for this t-bin
|
|
160
|
- Gabriel: there is some evidence that the Rosenbluth plots are not
|
|
161
|
left-right symmetric, which is also reflected in the Data/MC ratios
|
|
162
|
- they see this in their data too. It indicates some small problem in the
|
|
163
|
data that is not yet corrected, but have difficulty understanding where
|
|
164
|
it's coming from
|
|
165
|
- Garth: agrees. The only solution he can think of is to assign a larger
|
|
166
|
sysematic to LT, TT to account for the asymmetry, perhaps in the Model
|
|
167
|
Dependence
|
|
168
|
- *NB* Vijay did not have his Model Dependence results immediately
|
|
169
|
available, it's important that we have a chance to look them over and
|
|
170
|
thing about them
|
|
171
|
|
|
172
|
- analysis difficulties:
|
|
173
|
- getting an unusual error when try to use jput -cache
|
|
174
|
FATAL Class not found: jlab.scicomp.shell.io.InputOutputSubprocess, caused
|
|
175
|
by jlab/scicomp/shell/io/InputOutputSubprocess
|
|
176
|
- unfortunately, no one has any suggestions. Best to contact CC helpdesk
|
|
177
|
|
|
178
|
Junaid
|
|
179
|
------
|
|
180
|
- no report, working on thesis
|
|
181
|
- most recent LT-sep results were presented in March 27 meeting
|
|
182
|
|
|
183
|
- requests Gabriel to post his kinematic offsets info, interested in seeing if
|
|
184
|
that gives better results
|
|
185
|
- after meedting: uploaded the 28-page kinematic offset study on
|
|
186
|
Redmine
|
|
187
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/issues/1238
|
|
188
|
- Also posted the presentation (from Feb. 2026) on the topic
|
|
189
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/issues/1221
|
|
190
|
|
|
191
|
Nathan
|
|
192
|
------
|
|
193
|
PionLT LT-sep cross checks
|
|
194
|
- finally getting same SIMC cross sections and yields as Junaid
|
|
195
|
- my mistake Junaid was using 1 wrong file in the earlier comparison
|
|
196
|
|
|
197
|
- Q2=5.0 W=2.95 data replay w/ all def-cut files, calibrations, etc.
|
|
198
|
- this setting has 3 epsilons
|
|
199
|
- shows plots from each epsilon, indicating the replays worked
|
|
200
|
- the default PID cuts need a lot of optimization, lots of K+Lambda, p+omega
|
|
201
|
events seen in pion MM histo
|
|
202
|
|
|
203
|
Nermin
|
|
204
|
------
|
|
205
|
PionLT LD2 analysis, setting up for cryotarget boiling study
|
|
206
|
- looking at Nathan's Lumi analysis scripts, tried replaying some Carbon runs
|
|
207
|
|
|
208
|
- analysis difficulties:
|
|
209
|
- frozen out of JLab account since Wednesday, contacted CC helpdesk
|
|
210
|
|
|
211
|
Kathleen
|
|
212
|
---------
|
|
213
|
PionLT LD2 analysis
|
|
214
|
- working on poster for IOP meeting at Univ of Brighton next week
|
|
215
|
- Stephen sent helpful comments, poster presentation is Monday
|
|
216
|
- giving a talk at Early Career workshop on Thursday, will circulate slides
|
|
217
|
|
|
218
|
- started on detector efficiency studies
|
|
219
|
|
|
220
|
- analysis difficulties:
|
|
221
|
- group area is full
|
|
222
|
- Stephen: Do "du -hd1" in /group/hallc/c-kaonlt (or c-pionlt) and to get
|
|
223
|
a rough idea of where lots of stuff is being stored
|
|
224
|
- it appears that Nathan is the culprit, using 25 GB
|
|
225
|
- cc.jlab.org/utils/disk-quota/
|
|
226
|
|
|
227
|
Next Meetings
|
|
228
|
-------------
|
|
229
|
- Thurs: Apr 16 @ 16:00 Eastern/14:00 Regina
|
|
230
|
- PionLT will go first
|
|
231
|
|
|
232
|
- Fri: Apr 17 @ 11:00 Eastern/9:00 Regina
|
|
233
|
- we will continue where we left off
|
|
234
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
242
|
|