Project

General

Profile

Hall C Commissioning Analysis Meetings » History » Version 10

Richard Trotta, 05/21/2018 11:09 AM

1 6 Richard Trotta
{{>toc}}
2
3 1 Richard Trotta
h1. Hall C Commissioning Analysis Meetings
4
5 2 Richard Trotta
* "BlueJeans Page":https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/BlueJeans_Information
6
* "Hall C Wiki Meetings Page":https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Commissioning_analysis_meetings
7 3 Richard Trotta
8 9 Richard Trotta
h2. *Notes following-up from the Hall C Analysis meeting on 5/17*
9 3 Richard Trotta
10 10 Richard Trotta
* *Notes from Dave Mack on BCM calibrations*
11 3 Richard Trotta
12 10 Richard Trotta
** The bcm constants to use for now are the same one's we're having Eric P load for the F2/EMC Pass 1 analysis at https://github.com/JeffersonLab/hallc-replay-f2xem/blob/master/PARAM/GEN/gscalers.param .
13 3 Richard Trotta
14 10 Richard Trotta
** These are from Deb's March results. The March bcm calibration was large and roughly in the middle of the run. You can see the quality of the fits in the ATTACHED.
15 3 Richard Trotta
16 10 Richard Trotta
** We haven't done a global analysis yet, nor have I resolved all discrepancies between Deb and Deepak. These values are just a +-2% place-holder since F2/EMC wanted to replay all their runs sooner rather than later.
17 3 Richard Trotta
18 10 Richard Trotta
** All the BCMs are linear down to very low currents, so the only things that affects a lumi analysis between 5 and 70 muA are:
19 3 Richard Trotta
20 10 Richard Trotta
** the offsets are uncertain to about +-0.1 muA.  (So Carbon Yield vs I can be expected to deviate by O(1)% at 10 muA.) If calibrations are stable, a global analysis will reduce this.
21 3 Richard Trotta
22 10 Richard Trotta
** my slight preference would be to use BCM4A for a lumi scan. The only bcm I would NOT use for a lumi scan is BCM4B since it was almost as noisy as the Unser signal. (eg, note the higher Chi2/ndf for this channel in Deb's plots)
23 3 Richard Trotta
24 10 Richard Trotta
* *Notes from Mark on tree variables for tracking efficiency*
25 3 Richard Trotta
26 10 Richard Trotta
** The tree variable for the tracking efficiency is H.hod.goodscinhit
27 3 Richard Trotta
28 10 Richard Trotta
** For the tracking efficiency calculated in the report file
29 3 Richard Trotta
30
<pre>
31
HMSScinGood           H.hod.goodscinhit == 1
32
HMSGoodBetanotrk      H.hod.betanotrack > 0.8 && H.hod.betanotrack < 1.3
33
34
35
HMSScinShould         HMSScinGood && HMSGoodBetanotrk && !hmsDCany_large
36
HMSScinShoulde        HMSScinShould && H.cal.etotnorm > 0.6&& H.cal.etotnorm < 2.0&& H.cer.npeSum > 0.5
37
HMSScinShouldh        HMSScinGood && H.cal.etotnorm <0.6&& H.cal.etotnorm>0.0&& H.cer.npeSum < 0.5
38
39
HMSScinDid            HMSScinShould && H.dc.ntrack > 0
40
HMSScinDide           HMSScinShoulde && H.dc.ntrack > 0
41
HMSScinDidh           HMSScinShouldh && H.dc.ntrack > 0
42
43
</pre>
44 4 Richard Trotta
45 10 Richard Trotta
** H.cal.etotnorm  is the ratio of the total calorimeter energy to the central momentum so it does not involve tracking.
46 3 Richard Trotta
47 10 Richard Trotta
** H.hod.goodscinhit is set to 1 if certain scintillator criterion are met. This code is in the method THcHodoscope::TrackEffTest