1
|
|
2
|
Kaon-LT and Pion-LT Analysis Tasks and Timeline
|
3
|
(Updated 8-Jul-2020)
|
4
|
|
5
|
Redmine version: https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Analysis_Tasks
|
6
|
|
7
|
Kaon-LT Data taking: 26-Sep-2018 -- 15-Apr-2019
|
8
|
Pion-LT Data taking: 21-Jun-2019 -- 20-Jul-2019
|
9
|
|
10
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
11
|
REPLAY 0 of data done by shift workers with online calibrations.
|
12
|
|
13
|
1-Aug-2019: Analysis begins
|
14
|
|
15
|
INITIAL CALIBRATION TASKS:
|
16
|
|
17
|
a) BCM calibrations.
|
18
|
---> DJM
|
19
|
Fall 2018-Spring 2019:
|
20
|
https://hallcweb.jlab.org/doc-public/ShowDocument?docid=1034
|
21
|
BCM1,2 are stable, have a small nonlinearity >60uA that remains to be
|
22
|
calibrated
|
23
|
Summer 2019:
|
24
|
https://hallcweb.jlab.org/doc-private/ShowDocument?docid=1037
|
25
|
BCM1,2 both okay, including small nonlinearity corr.
|
26
|
|
27
|
Status: Incomplete for Fall-Spring. Complete for Summer
|
28
|
|
29
|
b) Initial run tables.
|
30
|
---> ?
|
31
|
Run tables from shift workers posted on Redmine. Has anyone gone through
|
32
|
this to fix erroneous entries?
|
33
|
|
34
|
Status: Incomplete
|
35
|
|
36
|
c) Beam Energy calibrations.
|
37
|
---> MKJ
|
38
|
https://hallcweb.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Table_of_12_GeV_Beam_Energy_Measurements
|
39
|
This page incorporates May/2019 problem fix that caused to give wrong
|
40
|
beam energies.
|
41
|
|
42
|
Status: Complete
|
43
|
|
44
|
d) Python analysis scripts
|
45
|
---> Richard/Stephen
|
46
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/attachments/download/1000/Analysis_Meeting_14_05_20.pdf
|
47
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/attachments/download/998/KaonLTMeeting_5_13_20.pdf
|
48
|
|
49
|
Status: Complete
|
50
|
|
51
|
e) Timing windows and reference times
|
52
|
---> Richard/Stephen/Vijay/Ali
|
53
|
This was completed for hodoscopes, drift chambers by Richard/Stephen.
|
54
|
Every HMS/SHMS channel needs to be re-done for new hcana code.
|
55
|
|
56
|
Status: Incomplete
|
57
|
|
58
|
f) EDTM Deadtime corrections.
|
59
|
---> Richard/??
|
60
|
This has been looked at by various people. Need links to documentation.
|
61
|
|
62
|
Richard's study: ??
|
63
|
DJM's cross-check between EDTM and Hodo-3/4 deadtime:
|
64
|
https://hallcweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0010/001063/002/Combinatorics%20in%20Estimating%20the%20Hodo%203of4%20Trigger%20Livetimev2.pdf
|
65
|
|
66
|
Status: Incomplete
|
67
|
|
68
|
g) Drift chamber time-to-distance map calibrations, look at residuals.
|
69
|
---> Richard/Stephen
|
70
|
HMS+SHMS: https://redmine.jlab.org/documents/74
|
71
|
|
72
|
Status: Complete, but probably some recheck needed with new hcana
|
73
|
|
74
|
h) Calorimeter calibrations.
|
75
|
---> Richard/Stephen
|
76
|
HMS+SHMS: https://redmine.jlab.org/documents/74
|
77
|
Redmine lists this task as Ongoing by Hamlet/Richard/Vladimir/Vardan
|
78
|
Calorimeter calibrations have some wiggles that need to be fixed.
|
79
|
|
80
|
Bill Henry's 9-Jan-2020 report on calib algorithm improvements
|
81
|
https://hallcweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0010/001039/001/calorimeterCommis.pdf
|
82
|
|
83
|
Status: Calibration needs to be rechecked using improved algorithm
|
84
|
|
85
|
i) RF time for SHMS PID
|
86
|
---> Stephen
|
87
|
1-Apr-2020 Update:
|
88
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/attachments/download/949/KaonLT_Meeting_01_04_20.pdf
|
89
|
Still need to set RF gates for each particle type, apply TOF corrections for
|
90
|
particles other than pion, and check offsets for other settings.
|
91
|
|
92
|
Status: Working but not yet complete
|
93
|
|
94
|
j) SHMS and HMS Optics Improvements
|
95
|
---> MKJ
|
96
|
SHMS:
|
97
|
https://hallcweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0010/001044/006/Update%20to%20Optics%20Cuts%20April%202020.pdf
|
98
|
HMS: Not sure if Mark has posted improved HMS saturation correction yet
|
99
|
|
100
|
Status: Unsure
|
101
|
|
102
|
k) SHMS HGC calibration, cuts, PID analysis, efficiencies.
|
103
|
---> Vijay
|
104
|
New calibrations almost done. Report in progress.
|
105
|
A position dependent efficiency for pi+ and K+ will have to be implemented.
|
106
|
This is not yet started.
|
107
|
|
108
|
Status: Ongoing
|
109
|
|
110
|
l) SHMS Aerogel calibration, cuts, PID analysis, efficiencies.
|
111
|
---> Vladimir/Richard??
|
112
|
Redmine lists calibration completed by Vladimir. Need a link to the
|
113
|
report.
|
114
|
Cuts, PID analysis, efficiencies, not yet done.
|
115
|
|
116
|
Status: Ongoing
|
117
|
|
118
|
m) HMS Cherenkov calibration, cuts, PID analysis, efficiencies.
|
119
|
---> Richard/??
|
120
|
Calibrations: https://redmine.jlab.org/attachments/download/928/KaonLT_Meeting_11_26.pdf
|
121
|
PID analysis and efficiencies yet to do.
|
122
|
|
123
|
Status: Ongoing
|
124
|
|
125
|
n) SHMS tracking algorithm optimization and efficiencies.
|
126
|
---> Ali
|
127
|
Link to Tracking Efficiencies vs Rate (9-Jun-2020):
|
128
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/attachments/download/1007/KaonLT_Meeting_Jun_9.pdf
|
129
|
|
130
|
Status: Ongoing
|
131
|
|
132
|
o) Carbon luminosity scans versus current and rate.
|
133
|
---> Richard/Ali/Vijay
|
134
|
Need to check if the various luminosity scans give consistent results.
|
135
|
HMS,SHMS singles: partially done by Richard
|
136
|
https://logbooks.jlab.org/entry/3645294
|
137
|
All students need to repeat this work, particularly with new version of
|
138
|
hcana.
|
139
|
|
140
|
Status: Ongoing
|
141
|
|
142
|
p) LH2 boiling scans versus current and rate.
|
143
|
---> Richard/Ali/Vijay
|
144
|
Need to check if the various luminosity scans give consistent results.
|
145
|
HMS singles:
|
146
|
SHMS singles:
|
147
|
|
148
|
Status: New
|
149
|
|
150
|
q) Physics "luminosity" scans versus current.
|
151
|
---> Richard/Ali/Vijay
|
152
|
Peter Bosted has looked in detail at our data, leading to significant
|
153
|
improvements to hcana. We need to repeat his studies for ourselves.
|
154
|
|
155
|
Status: New
|
156
|
|
157
|
r) Check stability of cointime peak. In Fpi-2 it drifted with TDC temperature
|
158
|
and needed to be adjusted on a run-by-run basis to within 200 ps.
|
159
|
---> ??
|
160
|
Initial checks so far indicate the peak is stable.
|
161
|
Cointime resolution will be poorer in fall 2018 run due to DAQ cabling
|
162
|
issue. Mark has partial software fix that we need to be sure is
|
163
|
implemented.
|
164
|
|
165
|
Status: New
|
166
|
|
167
|
s) Initial Heepcheck offset fitting to get corrected E, E', theta'.
|
168
|
---> Richard/Ali/Vijay
|
169
|
|
170
|
Status: New
|
171
|
|
172
|
t) Initial ep elastic cross-section checks.
|
173
|
---> Richard/Ali/Vijay
|
174
|
Singles cross-sections, HMS and SHMS.
|
175
|
Partial look by Burcu:
|
176
|
https://hallcweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0010/001070/004/HMS_elastic_analysis.pdf
|
177
|
https://hallcweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0010/001071/001/SHMS_elastic_analysis.pdf
|
178
|
SHMS delta scans (only peak position checked so far, stability of normalized
|
179
|
yield ratio not yet checked)
|
180
|
Coin ep cross-sections.
|
181
|
Heep from CT experiment looks good with Holly's expert help
|
182
|
https://hallcweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0010/001072/001/CT_hydrogen_july2020.pdf
|
183
|
|
184
|
In Fpi-2, determing the correct proton absorption correction for normalized
|
185
|
required some literature review and other digging.
|
186
|
|
187
|
Status: New
|
188
|
|
189
|
u) Check that Heepcheck offsets produce consistent p(e,e'K+)L, p(e,e'pi+)n
|
190
|
p(e,e'p)omega missing masses.
|
191
|
---> ??
|
192
|
|
193
|
Status: New
|
194
|
|
195
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
196
|
FULL REPLAY 1 of data, with new calibrations.
|
197
|
|
198
|
This replay should include all new kinematic offsets, better timing
|
199
|
and PID calibrations, as well as Mark's most recent HMS and SHMS matrix
|
200
|
elements.
|
201
|
|
202
|
v) Quality control rechecks with new replay:
|
203
|
- carbon luminosity scans are flat vs. current and rate
|
204
|
- LH2 luminosity scans are flat vs. current and rate
|
205
|
|
206
|
w) HMS saturation corrections?
|
207
|
|
208
|
x) Final investigation of SHMS acceptance, optimize acceptance cuts based on
|
209
|
sieve-slit run analysis, agreement with single-arm MC.
|
210
|
|
211
|
Compare data and simulation plots of SHMS yfp,ypfp for various ytar,delta
|
212
|
bins to identify inconsistencies.
|
213
|
|
214
|
y) Trigger blocking studies.
|
215
|
|
216
|
Are extra factors needed to correct for missing FADC reference times, or any
|
217
|
other DAQ related effects? Initial info from Peter Bosted indicates this is
|
218
|
likely to be the case.
|
219
|
|
220
|
z) Recheck Heep singles and coin yields to identify and fix problems.
|
221
|
|
222
|
1) Stability checks. Need some scripts to look at invariant mass vs run
|
223
|
number, etc., for pi+/K+/p channels.
|
224
|
|
225
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
226
|
FULL REPLAY 2 of data, with improved optics and corrections.
|
227
|
|
228
|
SECOND LEVEL ANALYSIS TASKS with REPLAY 2 ntuples:
|
229
|
a) Final SHMS optic matrix element and acceptance determination.
|
230
|
|
231
|
b) Final HMS optics check.
|
232
|
|
233
|
c) Final Heepcheck offsets.
|
234
|
|
235
|
d) Better detector efficiency determination.
|
236
|
|
237
|
e) First check of Bill's L/T separation code.
|
238
|
|
239
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
240
|
FULL REPLAY 3 of data, with final calibrations and offsets.
|
241
|
|
242
|
THIRD LEVEL ANALYSIS TASKS with REPLAY 3 ntuples:
|
243
|
a) Final ep elastic cross-section checks.
|
244
|
|
245
|
b) Look at data in depth, and resolve outstanding problems.
|
246
|
|
247
|
c) First SIMC ntuple generation using new offsets.
|
248
|
|
249
|
d) Detailed Data/SIMC comparisons for HMS and SHMS focal plane and target
|
250
|
reconstructed quantities, as well as W, Q^2, t, phi.
|
251
|
|
252
|
e) Preliminary L/T separation results.
|
253
|
|
254
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
255
|
FULL REPLAY 4 of data, with outstanding problems resolved.
|
256
|
|
257
|
ADVANCED ANALYSIS TASKS with REPLAY 4 ntuples:
|
258
|
a) Final SIMC ntuple generation using final parameters.
|
259
|
|
260
|
b) Thorough look at L/T/LT/TT separations, consistency checks as necessary.
|
261
|
|
262
|
c) Final look at systematic error contributions.
|
263
|
|
264
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
265
|
Hopefully not necessary, but if we have to: FULL REPLAY 5 of data.
|
266
|
|
267
|
OBTAIN:
|
268
|
d) Separated cross-section results.
|
269
|
|
270
|
e) Form factor determination begins. Model systematic error tests.
|
271
|
Use more than one model, if at all possible.
|
272
|
|
273
|
f) Model dependence and other issues in form factor extraction.
|
274
|
|
275
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
276
|
Begin thesis writing, drafts of first papers.
|