|
1
|
|
|
2
|
Jan 26/22 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
|
|
3
|
----------------------------------------------
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
A brief meeting due to the ongoing run.
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
Participants:
|
|
8
|
- Richard Trotta, CUA
|
|
9
|
- Pete Markowitz, FIU
|
|
10
|
- Jacob Murphy, Ohio
|
|
11
|
- Nathan Heinrich, Garth Huber, Muhammad Junaid, Vijay Kumar, Love Preet,
|
|
12
|
Regina
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
Please remember to post your slides at:
|
|
15
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
Nathan
|
|
18
|
------
|
|
19
|
- Mode-10 Update
|
|
20
|
- Mark had suggested to change the pulse amplitude threshold in hcana
|
|
21
|
- is 10mV in hardware
|
|
22
|
- was 5mV in hcana
|
|
23
|
- changing amplitude threshold in software doesn't seem to work
|
|
24
|
- weird difference between FADC and hcana in PuseTimeRaw (different plot
|
|
25
|
scaling?)
|
|
26
|
- PulseAmpRaw, Pulse IntRaw look very similar
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- *Suggestions*
|
|
29
|
Huber: Eager to see what physics Mode-10 data look like, comparing high and
|
|
30
|
low rate runs
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
Jacob
|
|
33
|
-----
|
|
34
|
- Analysis of EDTM Study #2
|
|
35
|
- currents were 10uA, 55uA, various PS1,2,3,4
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
Run 13898: TLT=1.002, 55uA, PS2=8, PS4=5
|
|
38
|
Run 13900: TLT=0.918, 55uA, PS2=8
|
|
39
|
- apparently this can make sense, since the HMS EDTMs block the SHMS EDTMs,
|
|
40
|
due to their lower PS.
|
|
41
|
- can separate the HMS, SHMS EDTM timing distributions by doing a fit, since
|
|
42
|
the individual shapes are known from other runs
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
Run 13905: TLT=1.047, 100Hz EDTM rate
|
|
45
|
- need to investigate this more.
|
|
46
|
- *Task for JM*
|
|
47
|
- will think about writing an MC to understand these data
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
- Richard's EDTM Study w/o Beam
|
|
50
|
Run 14140: Three EDTM 1kHz time raw peaks observed
|
|
51
|
- not seen in regular LUMI runs
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
- * Question for future study*
|
|
54
|
- can these extra peaks be reflections that maybe are part of the TLT>1
|
|
55
|
problem?
|
|
56
|
|
|
57
|
Vijay
|
|
58
|
-----
|
|
59
|
- Looking at Q2=0.38, 0.42 Heep data (Summer 2019)
|
|
60
|
2.7 GeV: 1 coin, 6 singles setting
|
|
61
|
3.6 GeV: 1 coin
|
|
62
|
4.5 GeV: 1 coin
|
|
63
|
- for one run, the data doesn't look like a Heep run, so this needs to be
|
|
64
|
checked
|
|
65
|
|
|
66
|
- * Suggestions*
|
|
67
|
- need to recheck beam energy and angles in STANDARD.KINEMATICS
|
|
68
|
|
|
69
|
Next Meeting
|
|
70
|
------------
|
|
71
|
Wednesday Feb 9 at Noon Eastern/11:00 Regina
|