1
|
Nov 23/22 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
|
2
|
----------------------------------------------
|
3
|
(Notes by GH and SJDK)
|
4
|
|
5
|
Today: PionLT will be discussed first
|
6
|
|
7
|
Please remember to post your slides at:
|
8
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
|
9
|
|
10
|
Present
|
11
|
-------
|
12
|
Regina - Garth Huber, Stephen Kay, Ali Usman, Alicia Postuma, Nathan Heinrich,
|
13
|
Love Preet
|
14
|
CSULA - Konrad Aniol
|
15
|
CUA - Richard Trotta, Tanja Horn
|
16
|
FUI - Pete Markowitz
|
17
|
Ohio - Julie Roche
|
18
|
Glasgow - David Hamilton
|
19
|
|
20
|
Nathan Updates
|
21
|
--------------
|
22
|
- PhD Committee meeting went well
|
23
|
- Classes to catch up on
|
24
|
- Likely have an update in ~2 weeks
|
25
|
|
26
|
Stephen Updates
|
27
|
---------------
|
28
|
RF timing resolution improvements
|
29
|
- Particle corrected RF time working
|
30
|
- Individual offsets added in
|
31
|
- Works nicely for various settings
|
32
|
- Actually helps with the 2ns setting quite a lot, useful for PID here in the
|
33
|
kaon case
|
34
|
- trying to remove residual correlation with CoinTime, but didn't get it to
|
35
|
work yet
|
36
|
- will push the corrections by particle type soon
|
37
|
|
38
|
Richard Updates
|
39
|
---------------
|
40
|
Variable Differences between hcana and SIMC
|
41
|
- Emailed Carlos about his calculations
|
42
|
- Carlos explicitly recalculates everything
|
43
|
- Will have to redo calculation in SIMC
|
44
|
- starting to work on SIMC code changes
|
45
|
|
46
|
Luminosity Scans
|
47
|
- Ali has been playing with tracking parameters
|
48
|
- previously was using combined SING+COIN to determine trackeff
|
49
|
- now using trackeff from SING only
|
50
|
- improves positive polarity current dependence by 5%, so only 15%
|
51
|
remaining
|
52
|
- BCMcurrent offsets
|
53
|
- tried a 100nA offset, tightened up the rate dependence, makes linear
|
54
|
target boiling effect more apparent
|
55
|
- Improvements to this, will try 10nA next
|
56
|
|
57
|
Bill's LT-sep Code
|
58
|
- will contact Bill this week about some questions
|
59
|
|
60
|
Alicia Updates
|
61
|
--------------
|
62
|
Beam Spin Asymmetry (BSA)
|
63
|
- replayed Q2=3, W=2.32, hi-eps, S.Wood earlier did Center setting for
|
64
|
comparison
|
65
|
- New analysis script which gets +ve/-ve helicity trees
|
66
|
- focal plane cuts applied, RF cut is open, PID cuts but no HGC cut
|
67
|
- S.Wood is looking at the Beam Polarization, so just raw asymmetries so far
|
68
|
- no dummy subtraction
|
69
|
- Center setting comparison with S.Wood looks good
|
70
|
- Left setting has low stats for phi ~ 0
|
71
|
- Right setting has low stats for phi ~ +/-pi
|
72
|
- Trying to choose -t bins for the data
|
73
|
- Equal number of events per bin, not equal widths
|
74
|
- Combined (roughly) all three settings to get initial view of asymmetry
|
75
|
t-dependence
|
76
|
- See sinusoidal relationship in each
|
77
|
- Amplitude of the asymmetry grows with -t, looks very nice!
|
78
|
|
79
|
- Question: t binning
|
80
|
- Ali should probably use consistent binning in -t with the helicity
|
81
|
analysis, to simplify interpretation of the data
|
82
|
- Bin 5: *investigate* changing upper cut (i.e. remove some of the long
|
83
|
tail), to simplify comparison to theory
|
84
|
- Cut off low -t bin 1 for similar reason
|
85
|
- Equalize bins 2 and 3 in terms of width?
|
86
|
|
87
|
- On plot - Centre of each bin is shown, not the average. Could plot vs
|
88
|
average -t of each bin
|
89
|
- Q2/W/Epsilon distributions for each -t bin
|
90
|
- Want average values for each bin
|
91
|
- Tanja: Should investigate binning in K+ data too
|
92
|
- Richard can make similar plots to Alicia quite quickly
|
93
|
|
94
|
- Don't really need asymmetry for both epsilons
|
95
|
- Just use the one with full phi coverage
|
96
|
- However, do want high/low epsilon to have the same binning (for Ali's
|
97
|
LT-separation), so may briefly need to look at the low epsilon t-binning
|
98
|
- Final fit for sig_LT' extraction will need to include cos(phi) cos(2phi)
|
99
|
in denominator, in addition to dominant sin(phi) in numerator
|
100
|
|
101
|
- Missing Mass Plots
|
102
|
- some background underneath pi+n peak still apparent, but no dummy target
|
103
|
subtraction yet and cuts are not yet optimized
|
104
|
- any background under the pi+n peak is likely to have a different BSA than
|
105
|
the foreground data, will need to do some systematic studies on the effect
|
106
|
- CLAS (Stefan Diehl) analysis dealt with the background by doing a
|
107
|
side-band analysis and applied a correction to their data
|
108
|
- the side-band was selected to be the events to the LEFT of the pi+n peak
|
109
|
- hopefully we can get our data clean enough that that this is not needed
|
110
|
|
111
|
Ali Updates
|
112
|
-----------
|
113
|
- Discussing with other groups regarding HeeP/Lumi issues
|
114
|
- looking at changes to track reconstruction params, and pruning params
|
115
|
- when finalized, will make slides to show details
|
116
|
- Heep offset issue on hold until variable difference issue is fixed
|
117
|
- new error calculations for all efficiencies (Binomial instead of Gaussian)
|
118
|
- should have something to show next week
|
119
|
|
120
|
Garth Updates
|
121
|
-------------
|
122
|
- WNPPC - https://wnppc.triumf.ca/2023/index.html
|
123
|
in Banff National Park (Rocky Mountains) in mid-February
|
124
|
- Regina group is sending 5 people. Abstracts will be circulated as they are
|
125
|
available.
|
126
|
- If USA colleagues are interested, the Abstract submission deadline is Dec 15.
|
127
|
|
128
|
Next Meeting
|
129
|
------------
|
130
|
Wed Nov 30 @ 8:15 Eastern/7:15 Regina/5:15 Pacific
|
131
|
- KaonLT will go first
|