1
|
July 20/23 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
|
2
|
-----------------------------------------------
|
3
|
(Notes by GH)
|
4
|
|
5
|
Today: KaonLT will be discussed first
|
6
|
|
7
|
Please remember to post your slides at:
|
8
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
|
9
|
|
10
|
Present
|
11
|
-------
|
12
|
Regina - Garth Huber, Ali Usman, Alicia Postuma, Muhammad Junaid,
|
13
|
Portia Switzer, Nathan Heinrich, Vijay Kumar
|
14
|
JLab - Dave Gaskell
|
15
|
CUA - Richard Trotta, Tanja Horn
|
16
|
FIU - Pete Markowitz
|
17
|
Ohio - Julie Roche
|
18
|
CSULA - Konrad Aniol
|
19
|
|
20
|
Richard Updates
|
21
|
---------------
|
22
|
DG, AU, RT met Monday on implementing HGC hole cut in SIMC
|
23
|
- a common recon_hcana script will be used to calculate the variables and
|
24
|
apply the cut for both hcana and SIMC
|
25
|
- for now, the same HGC cut is used for low and high epsilon (Vijay's hole)
|
26
|
- a larger hole will have to be drawn for the 10.6 GeV (high eps) data
|
27
|
|
28
|
GH, AU, RT, VK met to clarify some issues with LT-separation procedure
|
29
|
- RT had a bug when combining runs, bug related to the RF time windows
|
30
|
- *REMINDER* use Stephen's TOF-corrected RF variables for pi/K/p to get
|
31
|
optimal RF resolution/particle separation
|
32
|
See slides at: https://hallcweb.jlab.org/doc-private/ShowDocument?docid=1199
|
33
|
|
34
|
MMk plot with PeterB's adjusted Aerogel cut <4pe & -5<RFtime<5ns
|
35
|
- HGC hole cut also implemented, <1.5pe removes proton events
|
36
|
- something seemed wrong, the hole cut removed way too many events
|
37
|
- upon further check, RT realizes the cut was backwards, keeping ONLY the
|
38
|
hole
|
39
|
|
40
|
Ali Updates
|
41
|
-----------
|
42
|
- new effic calcs w/finalized PID cuts for analysis & recalculating them
|
43
|
- setting up SIMC for LT-sep iterations
|
44
|
- DG pushed Delta Breit-Wigner shape changes from PeterB
|
45
|
- code is in physics_pion.f, uses exclusive pi+n model and applies
|
46
|
scaling factor
|
47
|
- longer term, we should make physics_delta_recoil.f with an entirely new
|
48
|
cross section model, after we have LT-separated results
|
49
|
- PID cuts finlized for pi+
|
50
|
- working on t-binning
|
51
|
|
52
|
Vijay Updates
|
53
|
-------------
|
54
|
HMS calorimeter efficiency update
|
55
|
- Heep data are very clean, applied >0.7 cut, but would get same efficiency
|
56
|
if a lower cut >0.2 was used
|
57
|
- get efficiency 0.9979+/-4E-5
|
58
|
- will apply this efficiency to ALL data, even those physics runs P<1 GeV/c
|
59
|
with lower cut, as we discussed last week
|
60
|
|
61
|
Next steps
|
62
|
- restart Lumi and boiling studies
|
63
|
- EDTM-LT already tested, no questions
|
64
|
|
65
|
Alicia Updates
|
66
|
--------------
|
67
|
PARTONS implementation
|
68
|
- meeting tomorrow morning with Pawel Sznajder (Nat.Cent.Nucl.Res. Poland) on
|
69
|
the discrepancy seen between her cross section values and those sent by GK
|
70
|
|
71
|
- GH, AP discussed a BSA paper outline
|
72
|
- Overleaf project is set up
|
73
|
- will draft assuming we submit to PRL
|
74
|
- won't have space to list asymmetry results with two different fits
|
75
|
- can submit supplemental information (table of results, which can list
|
76
|
both)
|
77
|
- but the paper discussion will most likely be based on a weighted-average
|
78
|
of the two results
|
79
|
|
80
|
Nathan Updates
|
81
|
--------------
|
82
|
HGC calib
|
83
|
- reviews photoelectron fits from Vijay's code
|
84
|
- puzzling trend in calib params
|
85
|
- linear fits vs Run#
|
86
|
- decreasing gain stopped after Dec/21 for PMTS 2,3,4
|
87
|
- DG is planning to discuss this with Dave Mack now that he's back
|
88
|
- has not yet implemented the calib fit functions into hcana
|
89
|
standard.database
|
90
|
|
91
|
Working on verifying standard.kinematics for 2021 data
|
92
|
|
93
|
Junaid Updates
|
94
|
--------------
|
95
|
Fixing param files for 2021-22
|
96
|
- OfflinePionLT_xxx-yyy.param
|
97
|
- NH suggests to use a sed command to replace line43 in a uniform manner
|
98
|
during the calorimeter calib process
|
99
|
|
100
|
Portia Updates
|
101
|
--------------
|
102
|
First comparison of PeterB's SIDIS model to MM histo shape right of DeltaPi
|
103
|
events looks promising
|
104
|
- only plan to use SIDIS and DeltaPi SIMC distributions to get the shape,
|
105
|
not the magnitude
|
106
|
- will show some plots after more work has been done
|
107
|
|
108
|
Next Meeting
|
109
|
------------
|
110
|
- Thur July 27 @ 16:00 Eastern/14:00 Regina/13:00 Pacific
|
111
|
- PionLT will go first
|
112
|
|
113
|
|
114
|
|
115
|
|
116
|
|
117
|
|
118
|
|