Kaon LT Meetings » CTleakage_mtg_23oct16.txt
| 1 |
|
|---|---|
| 2 |
--- |
| 3 |
2023 Oct 16 (Notes from CT Leakage Meeting) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Attendance: Alicia P., Ali U., Garth H., Richard T. |
| 6 |
--- |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Cointime Leakage Issue |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
- Ali was updated on the bifurcation seen in beta vs CT |
| 12 |
- The bifurcation needs to be cut out and corrected with a beta efficiency |
| 13 |
- A consistent beta cut needs to be applied for all runs (heep included) |
| 14 |
- Use 8.2 data as a reference to check what good data looks like |
| 15 |
- Nathan suggested it may be a rate dependent correction so such a beta efficiency may need to be applied setting by setting |
| 16 |
- It is a beta correction not CT (they are correlated), but a cut in beta will also apply to CT |
| 17 |
- CT is based off the SHMS reference time so HMS should be correlated to this |
| 18 |
- Ali can add the beta efficiency to the report file to check the possible rate dependence |
| 19 |
- In CT vs beta: Three boxes... |
| 20 |
- Around central peak |
| 21 |
- Lower bifurcation |
| 22 |
- Upper streak |
| 23 |
- This will require a MM cut for each particle type, a CT cut, and possibly randoms |
| 24 |
- CT vs MM plot binned in cuts of beta may help to pick a good "box" for each scenario |
| 25 |
- Maybe combine upper+lower and apply cut in CT vs MM. Then compare ratio of this upper+lower and central peak to all data, respectively. |
| 26 |
- Make sure PID also included |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Next Steps |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
- Everything will need to be replayed after this |
| 32 |
- This will include new offset values |
| 33 |
- Out of plane offsets is not fully resolved yet |
| 34 |
- Possibly find from Pmy? |
| 35 |
- Ali will work on report file and Richard will finish up offsets. Then a new replay of all data will be done. |