Kaon LT Meetings » CTleakage_mtg_23oct16.txt
1 |
|
---|---|
2 |
--- |
3 |
2023 Oct 16 (Notes from CT Leakage Meeting) |
4 |
|
5 |
Attendance: Alicia P., Ali U., Garth H., Richard T. |
6 |
--- |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
Cointime Leakage Issue |
10 |
|
11 |
- Ali was updated on the bifurcation seen in beta vs CT |
12 |
- The bifurcation needs to be cut out and corrected with a beta efficiency |
13 |
- A consistent beta cut needs to be applied for all runs (heep included) |
14 |
- Use 8.2 data as a reference to check what good data looks like |
15 |
- Nathan suggested it may be a rate dependent correction so such a beta efficiency may need to be applied setting by setting |
16 |
- It is a beta correction not CT (they are correlated), but a cut in beta will also apply to CT |
17 |
- CT is based off the SHMS reference time so HMS should be correlated to this |
18 |
- Ali can add the beta efficiency to the report file to check the possible rate dependence |
19 |
- In CT vs beta: Three boxes... |
20 |
- Around central peak |
21 |
- Lower bifurcation |
22 |
- Upper streak |
23 |
- This will require a MM cut for each particle type, a CT cut, and possibly randoms |
24 |
- CT vs MM plot binned in cuts of beta may help to pick a good "box" for each scenario |
25 |
- Maybe combine upper+lower and apply cut in CT vs MM. Then compare ratio of this upper+lower and central peak to all data, respectively. |
26 |
- Make sure PID also included |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
Next Steps |
30 |
|
31 |
- Everything will need to be replayed after this |
32 |
- This will include new offset values |
33 |
- Out of plane offsets is not fully resolved yet |
34 |
- Possibly find from Pmy? |
35 |
- Ali will work on report file and Richard will finish up offsets. Then a new replay of all data will be done. |