Project

General

Profile

Kaon LT Meetings » mtg_24aug15.txt

Garth Huber, 08/21/2024 06:09 PM

 
1
                 Aug 15/24 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
2
                 ----------------------------------------------
3
                            (Notes by Dave and Alicia)
4

    
5
                     Today: PionLT will be discussed first
6

    
7
Present
8
-------
9
DG, Junaid, Nathan, Nacer, Zachary, Alicia, Richard, Ali, Pete
10

    
11
Junaid
12
------
13
Showed Heep Em/Pm distributions vs. raster y and x.  
14
- After flipping sign on raster y calibration constants, correlation is greatly
15
  reduced (XEM2 also had to flip the sign).  
16
- Still some small remaining correlation.  
17
  - DG suggests flipping sign on raster x calibration also - might impact
18
    reconstruction due to "ExtTar" corrections.
19

    
20
Zachary and Nathan
21
------------------
22
Lumi scans from 2021.  
23
- Able to look at C and LH2 for 2nd scan, but only LH2 from 1st scan due to
24
  report output issues.
25

    
26
- Scan 2:
27
  - Carbon yields are flat for all quantities (scalers, events w/out tracking,
28
    tracks).  
29
  - LH2 scalers look "ok", but other qunatities show anti-boiling.  
30
  - Total live time looks not plausible for some cases 
31
  - DG suggest just using simple computer live time for 1st pass.
32

    
33
- Scan 1: LH2 shows similar anti-boiling here.
34

    
35
Nacer
36
-----
37
Looking at 8.2 GeV Heep data.  
38
- Large DATA/SIMC ratio (1.122+/-0.006).  
39
- Observed strange shape in HMS yptar distribution in data 
40
  - excess at larger yptar.  
41
  - Tried to look at that region to see if there are some strange
42
    backgrounds.  Interestingly, when just looking at events from radiative
43
    tail, the yptar distribution looks more reasonable.
44

    
45
- DG notes that he's seen similar issues in the DIS data from 2022-2023.
46
  - Suspect matrix element problem (we are using new matrix elements fit in
47
    2018).
48
  - Higher HMS momentum settings that use Jacob's matrix elements look better.
49

    
50
- DATA/SIMC ratio likely not due to this yptar issue 
51
  - DG is suspicious of the large dead time from the EDTM. 
52
  - Suggests looking at computer live time again.
53

    
54
Richard
55
-------
56
Shows results from his analysis of same Heep data.  
57
- Has even large DATA/SIMC ratio (~1.2), but this is likely due to smaller
58
  3/4 efficiency in SHMS (Richard sees ~92%, whicle Nacer sees ~97%).  
59
- Need to determine the origin of this difference between Richard's and
60
  Nacer's analyses.
61

    
62
At this point, Dave had to leave.  Alicia takes notes for rest of meeting.
63

    
64
- Richard/Nacer will meet this week to discuss discrepancies between their
65
  results
66
  - Suggestion from Dave/Ali to compare EDTM vs CPU live times
67
  - EDTM LT drops to 90% for the 8.2 GeV run period, otherwise is stable around
68
    99%
69
  - Correcting EDTM should bring this point in line with the rest of the data
70

    
71
- Still need to add error bars
72

    
73
Plots of sigL, sigT, sigLT, sigTT vs -t
74
- Same plots as last week with addition of Q2=4.4, W=2.74 setting
75
- Currently working on Q2=3.0, W=2.32
76
- New setting shows same general trends, but with some large outliers from
77
  previous fit functions
78

    
79
- All settings normalized to W=3.0. W=2.74 may be too far away to normalize
80
  without better understanding the W-dependence (higher order terms may be
81
  required)
82

    
83
- Suggestion from Ali to split data into two sets, with mean W=3.0 (3.14, 3.02,
84
  2.95) and W=2.5 (2.32, 2.74)
85

    
86
- Meta-analysis post-publication of Q2, W-dependence etc may be very
87
  interesting
88

    
89
Alicia
90
-------------
91
- BSA paper still under review
92
- No update, studying for comprehensive exam 
93

    
94
Ali
95
--------------
96
- No update, writing thesis
97
- Expect next updates in a few weeks
98

    
99

    
100
Next Meeting
101
------------------
102
- Thur Aug 22 @ 15:00 Eastern/13:00 Regina
103
- KaonLT will go first
(490-490/559)