1
|
Apr 17/25 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
|
2
|
----------------------------------------------
|
3
|
(Notes by GH)
|
4
|
|
5
|
Today: PionLT will be discussed first
|
6
|
|
7
|
Present
|
8
|
-------
|
9
|
Regina - Garth Huber, Nacer Hamdi, Alicia Postuma, Muhammad Junaid,
|
10
|
Nathan Heinrich, Vijay Kumar, Nacer Hamdi
|
11
|
JLab - Dave Gaskell
|
12
|
FIU - Pete Markowitz
|
13
|
Virginia - Richard Trotta
|
14
|
CUA - Tanja Horn
|
15
|
|
16
|
Junaid
|
17
|
------
|
18
|
Q2=3.85, W=2.62 t-binning
|
19
|
- went from 7 to 5 t-bins, covering range 0.16<-t<0.50
|
20
|
- roughly 5k events/bin, up from ~3.8k before
|
21
|
- lowest number of counts in a bin is 4315
|
22
|
|
23
|
- will do 15 phi-bins
|
24
|
- scripts to calculate yields for each t-phi bin in progress
|
25
|
- will give a summary of software framework and Qeff error calculation in a
|
26
|
future meeting
|
27
|
|
28
|
Nathan
|
29
|
------
|
30
|
PionLT Luminosity Scans
|
31
|
- Dave has looked briefly the CoinTime plots, needs to consider them in more
|
32
|
detail
|
33
|
- arranged a meeting to discuss them with Nathan: Tue Apr 22 @ 15:30 EDT
|
34
|
|
35
|
- Tanja reports that NPS found that a small non-linear BCM offset was needed to
|
36
|
get their Carbon scans to work out
|
37
|
- done by Avnish NPS RG1A scaler lumi analysis (from the NPS elog)
|
38
|
- corrected_current=H_BCM4A_Current + corr*sqrt(BCM_rate)
|
39
|
where corr is approximately -1.5nA/sqrt(Hz)
|
40
|
- applied a rate dependent correcton to Carbon Lumi data and then determined
|
41
|
current offset, which is about -200nA, compared to Nathan's ~35nA offset
|
42
|
|
43
|
Nacer
|
44
|
-----
|
45
|
KaonLT Q2=0.5 LT-sep t-phi binning
|
46
|
- solved some problems w/ error propagation in data binning script
|
47
|
- wrote SIMC binning scripts, they run well and quickly
|
48
|
- Data/MC ratio scripts, kinematics comparison plot scripts in progress
|
49
|
- had a very useful meeting with Richard yesterday on his LT-sep framework and
|
50
|
SIMC event weighting
|
51
|
- will adapt codes to K+ analysis
|
52
|
- will present some slides on Yield calculation and Error propagation in a
|
53
|
future meeting
|
54
|
|
55
|
Vijay
|
56
|
-----
|
57
|
Q2=0.50 MM offsets
|
58
|
- showed plots for low epsilon: center, Left1, Left2
|
59
|
- resulting offset about 6 MeV gives good agreement between data and MC
|
60
|
- Nacer comments on how well SIMC reproduces the pi+n radiative tail
|
61
|
- simply matching the highest bin of data and MC, works well for these
|
62
|
settings, but in general this method is sensitive to statistical
|
63
|
fluctuations and a peak fit is typically used
|
64
|
|
65
|
Richard
|
66
|
-------
|
67
|
KaonLT Q2=3.0, W=2.32 LT-sep, 4 t-bins
|
68
|
- functional forms from Q2=4.4, 5.5 seem okay
|
69
|
- Q2-dependence was removed for now to simplify process, only t-dependence,
|
70
|
will need to restore Q2-dependence later
|
71
|
- Data/MC ratios closer to 1 now for high epsilon, but >2 or higher for low
|
72
|
epsilon
|
73
|
- kinematic comparison plots overlaying Data and MC look good
|
74
|
- some very interesting differences in SHMS-delta between SHMS Center and
|
75
|
Left settings, but both are well described by SIMC
|
76
|
- preliminary L/T/LT/TT cross sections
|
77
|
- L,T have sensible t-dependence, sigL>sigT to middle of t-range
|
78
|
- main surprise is that LT,TT are very large, and LT doesn't go to zero as t
|
79
|
goes to -t_min
|
80
|
- we should consider some systematic studies to do if this holds up
|
81
|
|
82
|
Planned next steps:
|
83
|
- finish Q2=3.0, W=2.32
|
84
|
- parameterize Q2=2.115, W=2.65
|
85
|
- re-parameterize Q2=3.0, W=3.14 with new functional form
|
86
|
- rull SIMC runs with new functions and parameters
|
87
|
- full data replay
|
88
|
- systematic studies
|
89
|
|
90
|
Alicia
|
91
|
------
|
92
|
First look at Q2=3.0, W=3.14 u-channel data
|
93
|
- ran SIMC with omega, rho, phi, eta, eta-prime, Xphasespace generators
|
94
|
- modified Ali's piDelta shape study code for u-channel shape study
|
95
|
|
96
|
- for data, start with aggressive proton cuts to study PID and MM shapes
|
97
|
- decided on a CoinTime +/-2.25ns cut for proton selection
|
98
|
- RF vs Aerogel: applied a HGC<1.5 npe cut to select protons
|
99
|
- preliminary RF<1.7, Aero-NPE<3 cuts reduce pi+ leakthrough a lot, some
|
100
|
remains due to HGC hole
|
101
|
- RF vs CoinTime: if tight Cherenkov cuts, things are cleaned up a lot
|
102
|
- observe that the proton reals peak is not quite at zero, some shift is
|
103
|
planned to center peak at zero
|
104
|
- MM plot with progressive PID cuts applied
|
105
|
- pi+n peak shrinks a lot, much easier to see eta, eta-prime peaks after cuts
|
106
|
while they were not evident before cuts
|
107
|
- Q2=3.0, W=2.32 center MM plot has much less obvious peaks
|
108
|
- *NB* Vijay suggests to tighten the CT cut to see if that helps
|
109
|
|
110
|
- Q2=3.0, W=3.14 shape study
|
111
|
- sum of Xphasespace and rho MCs do not reproduce shape of continuum
|
112
|
distribution at higher MM, unlike Bill's thesis
|
113
|
- plot of u vs MM indicates that omega events don't extend below -u<0.6,
|
114
|
placing a cut to exclude this region removes a lot of the high MM events
|
115
|
- Ali says he does something similar in his piDelta BSA analysis
|
116
|
- omega peak doesn't quite line up with MC, will need to adjust MM peak by a
|
117
|
few MeV
|
118
|
|
119
|
- Lots of discussion about the PID and high MM region
|
120
|
- can place a but on HGC hole to reduce pi+ leakthrough
|
121
|
- *NB* if so, then should apply same cut to SIMC
|
122
|
- Richard says it's straightforward to implement this in recon_hcana
|
123
|
- Nacer: suggests to look at events only passing through HGC hole to better
|
124
|
understand the leakthrough
|
125
|
- Aerogel: applying NPE<3 cut, can look at higher MM region with varying PID cuts
|
126
|
|
127
|
- Garth: maybe the extra events at MM>1 GeV are due to proton SIDIS? Hem
|
128
|
reports seeing lots of u-channel proton events in pi-SIDIS data
|
129
|
- Dave: there is no model for this in SIMC yet, would have to modify
|
130
|
pi-SIDIS model accordingly
|
131
|
- *NB* Xphasespace model was written by Pawel Ambrozewicz for 4 GeV data, maybe
|
132
|
there is some limit in the code? Alicia will look more carefully at the
|
133
|
code
|
134
|
|
135
|
Ali
|
136
|
---
|
137
|
piDelta BSA
|
138
|
- new (finer) t-binning finalized
|
139
|
- to be efficient, will do some systematic studies in parallel with rebinned
|
140
|
shape study
|
141
|
- planned systematic studies:
|
142
|
- MM shape differences between data and SIMC
|
143
|
- new idea after discussion with Garth: tweak bkd fit by ~1 sigma (or
|
144
|
whatever seems appropriate based on reasonable fit to data) and extract
|
145
|
different asymmetry
|
146
|
- wrote new script to do these studies, some debugging underway
|
147
|
- plans to show some fitting plots next week
|
148
|
|
149
|
Next Meeting
|
150
|
-------------
|
151
|
- Thur Apr 24 @ 15:30 Eastern/13:30 Regina
|
152
|
- KaonLT will go first
|
153
|
** THIS TIME WILL BE USED AT LEAST UNTIL THE END OF AUGUST **
|
154
|
|
155
|
|
156
|
|
157
|
|
158
|
|