1
|
May 8/25 PionLT/KaonLT Analysis Meeting Notes
|
2
|
---------------------------------------------
|
3
|
(Notes by GH)
|
4
|
|
5
|
Today: KaonLT will be discussed first
|
6
|
|
7
|
Please remember to post your slides at:
|
8
|
https://redmine.jlab.org/projects/kltexp/wiki/Kaon_LT_Meetings
|
9
|
|
10
|
Present
|
11
|
-------
|
12
|
Regina - Garth Huber, Ali Usman, Alicia Postuma, Ivan Zhenchuk,
|
13
|
Muhammad Junaid, Nathan Heinrich, Nacer Hamdi
|
14
|
JLab - Dave Gaskell
|
15
|
CUA - Tanja Horn
|
16
|
Virginia - Richard Trotta
|
17
|
Ohio - Julie Roche
|
18
|
FIU - Pete Markowitz
|
19
|
|
20
|
Richard
|
21
|
-------
|
22
|
KaonLT LT-separations Q2=4.4, W=2.74
|
23
|
- fixing weird dip in unseparated cross sections near phi=180deg discussed last
|
24
|
week
|
25
|
- the problem was a ROOT issue, a cut was applied to eliminate from the
|
26
|
Rosenbluth fit those phi bins with negative cros section, however, this cut
|
27
|
seemed to not be used
|
28
|
- needed to put this cut directly into the Fortran code used for the
|
29
|
Rosenbluth fit
|
30
|
- after a few iterations, the unseparated cross sections are now positive for
|
31
|
all phi, and these bins are no longer excluded from the fit
|
32
|
- L,T,LT,TT functional forms unchanged from before
|
33
|
- added step 6 (discussed last week) in the Rosenbluth fitting algorithm,
|
34
|
i.e. fit LT,TT while keeping L,T fixed
|
35
|
- new separated results look much more sensible
|
36
|
- LT: now ~5, previously ~20
|
37
|
- TT: now ~8, previously 10-35
|
38
|
- L: now 8-0, before ~18
|
39
|
- T: now 6-10, before 4 to -3
|
40
|
- now T>L for all t-bins, which is more in line with theoretical expectations
|
41
|
- TT has decreasing trend to smallest -t bin
|
42
|
- LT is flatter, no clear decreasing trend with smaller -t
|
43
|
|
44
|
Future steps:
|
45
|
- given these large changes, will need to eventually demonstrate that both
|
46
|
sig_uns and the separated cross sections are stable
|
47
|
- Data|MC comparison plots can be shown next week
|
48
|
- will present a detailed systematic errors plan next week
|
49
|
|
50
|
Ali
|
51
|
---
|
52
|
piDelta BSA finer t-binning
|
53
|
- shape study for lowest -t bins completed
|
54
|
- ran into a problem with higher -t bins, the issue is that the pi+n process
|
55
|
doesn't populate some bins, which caused fits to fail
|
56
|
- in the process of removing pi+n entirely from high -t fit, taking longer
|
57
|
than expected
|
58
|
- plans to show final shape study, and possibly some early BSA results, next
|
59
|
week
|
60
|
|
61
|
Alicia
|
62
|
------
|
63
|
u-channel Q2=3.0, W=3.14 missing mass studies
|
64
|
- SHMS center setting, covering all of -pi<phi<+pi
|
65
|
- peak near MM~0 is fit better with DVCS MC than pi0 MC
|
66
|
- somewhat surprising that DVCS would be so prominent in comparison to pi0,
|
67
|
Alicia plans to also look at MM^2 as that would better indicate if it's
|
68
|
really DVCS or not
|
69
|
- in the end, it really doesn't matter what process it is, since we're not
|
70
|
likely to extract results for the MM~0 peak, just as long as it's fit
|
71
|
well to describe non-omega background in the histogram
|
72
|
- high MM region: still need to figure out Pythia generator for this region
|
73
|
- MM plots shown for 8 phi bins, did MC fits to each
|
74
|
- eta' peak is surprisingly large, but there is no proper background
|
75
|
underneath yet, so likely it's overestimated
|
76
|
- some discussion about pi+|K+ leakthrough
|
77
|
- applying HGC hole cut to reduce leakage, no K+|pi+ subtraction yet
|
78
|
|
79
|
- SHMS left setting
|
80
|
- MM distribution cuts off earlier than for center setting, around 1.35 GeV
|
81
|
- MM plots for 8 phi bins: 4 filled bins near phi~+/-pi, bins near phi~0
|
82
|
mostly empty (as expected)
|
83
|
- clear omega peaks are seen, also a more prominent K+Lambda peak than for
|
84
|
- center setting, nearly as big as omega
|
85
|
|
86
|
- SHMS right setting
|
87
|
- MM distribution extends up to ~1.5 GeV
|
88
|
- MM plots for 8 phi bins: 4 filled bins near phi~0, so left+right settings
|
89
|
give full phi coverage
|
90
|
- some evidence of pi+n leathrough, smaller than K+Lambda, but these events
|
91
|
are on shoulder of omega peak, so we will have to treat them carefully
|
92
|
- all plots are for full t(u) range
|
93
|
|
94
|
Next steps:
|
95
|
- will present a plan on how the analysis should proceed next week
|
96
|
- next step will be the Pythia generator for high MM region
|
97
|
- if it down't work, Plan B would be to work with Hem on modifying the
|
98
|
SIDIS generator for u-channel protons in SIMC
|
99
|
- then will look at K+|pi+ leakthrough subtraction
|
100
|
- too soon to know if any u-binning is possible, for this setting Ali has 3
|
101
|
t-bins, omega is likely less statistics than piDelta
|
102
|
|
103
|
Nacer
|
104
|
-----
|
105
|
Q2=0.5 KaonLT analysis
|
106
|
- Data|MC comparison plots shown
|
107
|
- P.dc.xp_fp shows some difference in width between Data and MC
|
108
|
- a weird dip is seen near center of H.gtr.th
|
109
|
- some discussion whether it's statistically significant or not
|
110
|
- Dave suspects an instrumental issue, the dip is close to where the two
|
111
|
mirrors overlap in the HMS Cherenkov, however Nacer is applying only a
|
112
|
HCer>2npe cut, so that should't really cause this
|
113
|
|
114
|
- MM histo shows the Lambda peak at 1.12 GeV instead of expected 1.16
|
115
|
- what is weird is that the Sigma peak is not similarly shifted, but appears
|
116
|
at the expected 1.19 GeV
|
117
|
- however, SIMC predicts correctly the observed spacing between these two
|
118
|
peaks
|
119
|
- a fixed offset of 3.68 MeV is applied to all MM data (both Lambda and
|
120
|
Sigma) to get them to line up with the MCs
|
121
|
|
122
|
- working on yield scripts per t-phi bin, would like to have some preliminary
|
123
|
cross sections to show at the CAP Congress in a month
|
124
|
|
125
|
Junaid
|
126
|
------
|
127
|
Q2=3.85, W=2.62 PionLT analysis
|
128
|
- showed t-binning for this setting last week
|
129
|
- found a small bug in error calculation script
|
130
|
- only bins with ~100% errors are those with 1-2 events (SHMS left or right)
|
131
|
so the errors appear to be sensible now
|
132
|
- ran SIMC more so that SIMC yield errors are much smaller than data, about
|
133
|
1%
|
134
|
|
135
|
- calculated Data/MC ratios, where MC uses default Bosted pion model
|
136
|
- even with no iterations, the ratios already 0.9-1.0(!)
|
137
|
|
138
|
- Data|MC comparisons
|
139
|
- generally the comparisons are very good, except for:
|
140
|
- HMS-delta has a significant dip at +6% in low epsilon data
|
141
|
- Dave: this looks like a mis-calibration of some segmented detector, such
|
142
|
as calorimeter or hodoscope
|
143
|
- suggests to look at calorimeter E/p vs delta, as well as beta vs delta
|
144
|
- Dave: do these data use Nathan's corrected Reference Times?
|
145
|
- while looking in more detail at Nathan's Lumi scan ROOT trees earlier
|
146
|
today, noticed a block shift at H.gtr.dp~6 when using the updated time
|
147
|
window cuts
|
148
|
- the same Run 14616 with the old cuts have no problem
|
149
|
- Nathan: it appears that somehow a bad calibration for the hodoscope
|
150
|
bars slipped in when changing the reference cuts, will investigate
|
151
|
|
152
|
Next steps:
|
153
|
- working on LTsep iteration framework
|
154
|
- GH giving a tutorial on this topic next Monday morning
|
155
|
|
156
|
Nathan
|
157
|
------
|
158
|
PionLT Coin Lumi deadtime problem
|
159
|
- last week, we discussed the effect of changing the reference time cuts, and
|
160
|
that the yields mysteriously did not change, although it was clear from the
|
161
|
CoinTime plots that they should have
|
162
|
- spent last few days looking at this
|
163
|
- found that #Events passing cuts makes no sense, seems way too low
|
164
|
- tried removing PID cuts and #Events went down instead of up!
|
165
|
- clearly something is massively wrong in the script
|
166
|
|
167
|
Next steps:
|
168
|
- will briefly consult with Junaid and Richard on the analysis script
|
169
|
- Nathan will give script debug info to Richard for him to look at
|
170
|
- if can't quickly find the problem, then will write a new script from scratch
|
171
|
- will also look at the calibration issue identified above by Dave
|
172
|
|
173
|
Ivan
|
174
|
----
|
175
|
- reading up on detectors, things starting to make a bit more sense now
|
176
|
Next Meeting
|
177
|
-------------
|
178
|
- Thur May 15 @ 15:30 Eastern/13:30 Regina
|
179
|
- KaonLT will go first
|
180
|
** THIS TIME WILL BE USED AT LEAST UNTIL THE END OF AUGUST **
|
181
|
|
182
|
|
183
|
|
184
|
|
185
|
|
186
|
|
187
|
|
188
|
|
189
|
|