Wiki » History » Version 4
Richard Trotta, 05/07/2018 12:53 PM
1 | 1 | Richard Trotta | h1. Notes from Meeting February 22, 2018 |
---|---|---|---|
2 | |||
3 | 4 | Richard Trotta | * Discussion of "Andres's":https://redmine.jlab.org/documents/19 slides on elastic W calculation in hcana - initial issue with negative W values seems to be due to outdated information in standard.kinematics file. Additional investigation ongoing. |
4 | 2 | Richard Trotta | * Brief description of Samip's work - working on coincidence timing decoding with JLab staff and re-optimization of kinematics |
5 | 1 | Richard Trotta | * Discussion of Richard's slides on run plan kinematics and preparations - |
6 | ** everyone agrees that in general want to have as many L/T cross section separations as possible in a robust run plan balancing statistics vs. systematics |
||
7 | ** before actual run may want to do a 3D optimization in all kinematic variables to get the best possible delta(epsilon) for the L/T separations |
||
8 | ** for each setting will need 1-2 shifts for calibrations - need to negotiate with other experiments in run group |
||
9 | ** kinematics plots W-Q2 show that still need to do some optimization |
||
10 | ** run sheets: include raster size, update coincidence count labeling, and carbon target labeling |
||
11 | * Discussion of next meeting. Garth at JLab 8-16 March - might have meeting during that time. |
||
12 | |||
13 | |||
14 | * *Action Items:* |
||
15 | ** Post slides/notes from this meeting and procedure to set up hcana in Redmine (Tanja) |
||
16 | ** Update run sheet and kinematic optimization for W/Q2 (Garth) |
||
17 | ** Circulate elastic calculations for kinematic settings (Samip) |
||
18 | ** Continue investigation of elastic data and run plan kinematics (Andres/Richard) |
||
19 | ** Test software installation instructions (Pete) |
||
20 | ** Draft email to JLab management about need for small angle beam pipe - need to have HMS minimum angle of less than 13 degrees for kaon L/T separations (Tanja) |
||
21 | |||
22 | h1. Notes from Meeting March 29, 2018 |
||
23 | |||
24 | * Details of adding points to fall run plan - will be ready sooner, likely in week of 4/1 (Garth, Samip, Tanja) |
||
25 | * Luminosity scans (Ryan, Andres, "Richard":https://redmine.jlab.org/documents/16, Pete) |
||
26 | * Macros, SIDIS analysis (Hem, Anashe) |
||
27 | * Elastic data (TBD) |
||
28 | 2 | Richard Trotta | |
29 | |||
30 | h1. Notes from Meeting April 26, 2018 |
||
31 | |||
32 | 3 | Richard Trotta | * Discussion luminosity scan analysis (earlier scan) - "Richard":https://redmine.jlab.org/documents/18 |
33 | 2 | Richard Trotta | ** Shown is a scaler-based analysis using scalers from report file and from ROOT tree - the values are different, why that is has to be checked |
34 | ** Notes on efficiencies in report file: |
||
35 | *** DT (EDTM) is not electronic deadtime. Instead use for now 50ns* trigger rate for HMS and 100ns* trigger rate for SHMS |
||
36 | *** Cherenkov efficiency seems low (check if that is due to PID, thresholds, pi/e, etc) |
||
37 | *** Tracking efficiency needs to be checked |
||
38 | *** 3/4 trigger efficiency seems ok |
||
39 | * Discussion luminosity scan analysis (later scan) - Ryan |
||
40 | ** Fewer carbon runs than earlier scan |
||
41 | ** Shown is a tracking-based analysis using data from the ROOT trees |
||
42 | ** First results for carbon, LH2, and LD2, but efficiencies need to be checked |
||
43 | * SIDIS analysis - Hem |
||
44 | ** Shown is a data/MC comparison for different kinematic settings. Agreement in shape is very good. Normalization has yet to be applied. |
||
45 | ** Discussion about agreement in z and apparent offset - relation of this offset with spectrometer offset |
||
46 | * Analysis of exclusive events in SIDIS - Samip |
||
47 | ** Shown is a look at the first kaon events in exclusive limit of SIDIS data |
||
48 | ** Ongoing work on implementing coincidence time into tree |
||
49 | * Discussion of run plan, and in particular possible low Q2/low energy |
||
50 | ** Assume that kaon low Q2=0.4 already included - have kinematics with specified beam energies, if needed |
||
51 | ** For pion form factor and LT, have two possible settings that can use the prescribed beam energies: Q2=1.45 and 0.35 GeV2 - prioritize towards the higher Q2 as not as sensitive to offsets |
||
52 | ** Garth will put this together in a draft email |